I bought this .
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1176775-REG/benq_sw2700pt_27_photographer_monitor_with.htmlMostly great reviews and highly recommended by two folks at BH I spoke to. Has the specs I want, and I decided I do not want or need 4K in a monitor any time soon, especially a 27". Revoke my cool photographer card if need be.
I also do not even own a printer, and sometimes I even say "screw it" when it comes to exposing to the right. And, the extra 600$ the EIZO would cost is not nothing to me. I spend my money more on travel--France last year, Ireland in 2017, and lots of trips up to the SF Bay area and environs to escape the horror of living in SoCal. If anything, I prioritize opportunity and capture over post-processing at this point in my life (And I'm probably going to CaptureOne after 14 years with LR, cause I'm not going to pay for CC every month). When I'm an old geezer, I won't be able to trek around the world as I (my wife and I) can now. (In case you are curious, I use a Nikon D7200 as my main rig and an Oly TG-5 for when things get really wet/messy)
In addition, I do about an hour of image editing per week at most in the last several years. Most of the work I'm known for (to the extent I'm known at all) is my grayscale electron micrography, which has been featured on a dozen journal, book, and magazine covers, and in five museum/gallery exhibits. For those cases, no matter how effort I expend on my image editing, most of of the downstream editing, production/printing is out of my control. And even then, color accuracy is not an issue (provided printers do not introduce a color cast). Sure, if I did hours of post-processing a day, I would certainly buy the EIZO. But, just like the guy who needs a fun car (e.g., a Miata) that will also serve mostly as a commuter, I also do not need to shell out 100$K to get 700 HP.