Well, WHO said they failed to make copies? Did Tucker or his people say that or is that the claim of the publisher? Clearly they have no quote from anyone from Tucker staff or they would have quoted.
So is this your level of research and validation? If you have a direct quote, please post it.
Who cares if anyone made copies or not? Tucker now has them, as least I think so. I didn't go back and re-read all the articles to see if he actually said he had them, or he reportedly said he had them, or some anonymous person said he had them, or whatever the rest of the variations may be. If he has the documents, and I am not saying he does, but if he does have them, or access to them, or knows somebody who does, I wonder what the documents might say, and what Tucker or whomever has them, or has access to them, assuming they actually exist, may do with them. I am sure we will hear more about that aspect of the story. Actually, I am not sure. I really don't know if that will be the case. I am guessing based on incomplete information, and your guess is as good as mine. Well, your guess could be better or worse than mine depending on the actual circumstances. Reportedly.
I still have not watched the Carlson/Bobulinski interview. I was thinking I might go out and clean the garage again. Maybe I could do a better job. To be honest, I was hoping the whole thing would blow over, and I wouldn't have to watch it. Maybe the missing documents, assuming they exist, contain information that makes them a bigger story, if that is possible.
Does anyone know if Ron Johnson has subpoenaed UPS to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee?
I read an article that said Trump is unhappy with Barr because Barr does not appear to be doing anything to lock up Hunter Biden and Joe Biden, and perhaps others. Hillary, for example, but I am not sure. I can't find a link to the article I read so maybe I imagined I read it.
Poll
