For example, his claim that there's rampant voter fraud. He says it all the time, without evidence. It's never been proven or demonstrated.
The Heritage Foundation would beg to differ with you. Never? That sounds like bullshit and lies to me.
[Moderator: copy of link deleted]
The poster that you are replying to said
RAMPANT voter fraud. The Heritage article, that you link to, references in a BOLD TYPE HEADLINE their database of 1,285 voter fraud cases, but conveniently has no link to the database. I found it thru Google easily (despite their globalist socialist agenda that some claim).
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraudJust looking at the most populous state of California, They have 42 cases listed from 2001, the earliest case in their California database, until today. They've been working for 4 years gathering data.
The 1,285 cases they have in their database start in 1982 and run thru 2020 and covers the entire USA for local, state, and federal elections as well as signature fraud on petions. I wonder how many votes have been cast in the US since 1982 as well as signatures collected for petitions.
They don't mention in their headlines that it isn't just fraudulent vote cases they've collected, but other types of election law violations as well. They conveniently leave out any information regarding the starting dates for their database. You have to search for it. Maybe that's just an oversight on their part. I'm sure they're not trying to mislead anyone with their articles and reports that require you digging into the data for such information.
If that fits your idea of rampant, Good luck selling the idea. Maybe it's just a reading comprehension issue or an oversight on your part. I'm sure you're not trying to mislead anyone.