I've come across several articles which mention that 99% of those who die from Covid-19 have other serious medical conditions. This implies that the Covid-19 virus might be just 'the last straw that broke the camel's back', and that those who are healthy, with no medical conditions such as diabetes or high blood pressure, are safe, and will experience relatively mild symptoms if they are exposed to the virus.However, such articles always seen to mention just Italy, which seems to imply that Italians, especially the elderly, are very unhealthy. I'm wondering if this is a general principle that applies in all countries, that is, if you are healthy without any medical conditions, whatever your age, you will have an extremely low risk of dying from Covid-19 infection.
What sparked this inquiry was seeing a number of reports that 99% of deaths in Italy from Covid-19 were related to existing medical conditions.
How much would you be willing to pay to reduce your odds of dying from the coronavirus from 1.0% to 0.1%?https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-should-the-government-spend-to-save-a-life/
However, such articles always seen to mention just Italy, which seems to imply that Italians, especially the elderly, are very unhealthy.
In these trying times, I am so glad we have a president who is devoting all his energy and intelligence to solving the problem.
What I said that if this thing turns out to be a lot less the common flu, we have to think in terms of those comparable numbers.
Today's stats from Serbia, FWIW:From top to bottom, left to right:Total number, dead, recovered, active cases, tested. Serbia's population is about 7-8 million.The second image is a makeshift hospital for milder cases in a fairground facility.
Do you believe that if there were still a chance that this wasn't much more serious than a regular flu that all the people in the world who know about these things would be reacting the way they are?Why would they do that?
Herd mentality? We often do things because others are doing them.
I don't believe that's accurate. I suspect it's ' 99% of deaths had pre-existing medical conditions ' which is entirely different from saying that it was related to an existing medical condition.And I most definitely question the 99% number. Knowing your prediliction for accuracy, 'm guessing that that was figurative rather than literal.
I'm not sure it is entirely different. My understanding is a pre-existing condition is a condition that began in the past but might continue into the present, although usually under some degree of control through medication. Such conditions could be 'High Blood Pressure', 'Diabetes', and 'Heart Disease'. There tends not to be a complete cure for such conditions. If a pre-existing condition were completely cured it would be called a pre-existed condition, wouldn't it? From the following article: https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/global-covid-19-case-fatality-rates/"Report from the Italian National Institute of Health: analysed 355 fatalities and found only three patients (0.8%) had no prior medical conditions. See Table 1 in the paper; (99% who died had one pre-existing health condition):49% had three or more health conditions,26% had two other ‘pathologies’,25% had one.The most common problems in the 355 who died were: 76% high blood pressure; 36% diabetes, and 33% ischemic heart disease."Of course, the problem here is that only 355 fatalities have been analysed.
A good article on herd mentality and group consensus.https://www.consulting.com/herd-mentality
other good examples - selling stocks at distressed prices, and buying toilet paper at raised prices