Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Profiling, is it necessary?  (Read 397 times)

benoit@benoitmalphettes.com

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42
    • http://Benoit.LA
Profiling, is it necessary?
« on: January 16, 2020, 04:53:47 pm »

Is profiling with a device such as the i1 Studio really necessary ? I only use Canson Platine or Ilford GS on a Canon 4100 and so far their profiles seem very good and I am questioning the purchase of the i1 profiling device and the time it takes to do a custom profile. Any advice or feedback ?

Thanks in advance

Benoit

John Nollendorfs

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 623
Re: Profiling, is it necessary?
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2020, 05:09:14 pm »

If you are happy with your prints, and don't use many different papers, then I would so no! One way you could confirm, is to have someone with custom profiles make a print for you that from a file you have printed and  compare.
Logged

digitaldog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20652
  • Andrew Rodney
    • http://www.digitaldog.net/
Re: Profiling, is it necessary?
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2020, 05:15:42 pm »

For only two papers, no. You could get custom profiles built with a lot of money left over compared to that purchase.
Logged
http://www.digitaldog.net/
Author "Color Management for Photographers".

benoit@benoitmalphettes.com

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42
    • http://Benoit.LA
Re: Profiling, is it necessary?
« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2020, 08:07:25 pm »

Thank you for your advice which I will follow. I have been pleasantly surprised by the quality of the Canon Prograph in a 40x50 print on the Canson Platine with the profiles supplied by the paper manufacturer. Of course my NEC is calibrated regularly. I love the possibility of testing different color adj and/or Britghness and Contrast in the Canon PPL
Thanks again for taking the time to respond to my post.
Pages: [1]   Go Up