Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: smoke  (Read 379 times)

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
smoke
« on: January 09, 2019, 01:40:42 pm »

2 versions

petermfiore

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2705
    • Peter Fiore Fine Art
Re: smoke
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2019, 04:33:07 pm »

Hi Armand,

Both are wonderful...because there is a choice I prefer the first. Soft and strong at the same time.

Peter

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: smoke
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2019, 05:31:19 pm »

Hi Armand,

Both are wonderful...because there is a choice I prefer the first. Soft and strong at the same time.

Peter

Thank you!

I think the soft comes a lot from the haze/snow and the issues the RX10 iii had on focusing at max zoom. The strong partially comes from trying to compensate for the softness. Then again, you might have something else in mind when you say soft and strong.
The second is crisper but the smoke is not as appealing.

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13794
Re: smoke
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2019, 05:46:10 am »

My vote also goes to the first shot. I prefer the "shape" of the smoke and also the wider framing.
Logged
Francois

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10365
Re: smoke
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2019, 06:18:55 am »

Me too. The first version is definitely better.
Logged

Bob_B

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3747
  • It's all about light
    • Robert Belas Photography
Re: smoke
« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2019, 08:18:39 am »

The first for me as well, largely because of the smoke's symmetry with the mountain side.
Logged
Robert Belas Photography
www.belasphoto.com

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: smoke
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2019, 08:22:38 am »

Another vote for the first.
But the light is nice in the second.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

JNB_Rare

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1052
    • JNB54
Re: smoke
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2019, 08:37:39 am »

What makes the first one better (to me) is the length and direction of the plume. I like the light in the second shot better. Alas ...
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5565
    • Photos
Re: smoke
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2019, 12:16:39 pm »

Thank you! Sometimes conditions don't fully cooperate. I knew that it's a good scene but many times I can't get the shot that I want.
Pages: [1]   Go Up