LuLa posts many nouns, relatively few verbs.
IMHO, almost all *generalizations* about art are, at some level, fundamentally untrue, including these about adjectives and nouns. That commentary is what you get when theory becomes more important than the face-to-face encounter with art. Matthias Grunewald's crucifixion scene is both epically noun and epically adjective and you don't need to know anything about Christ to get a powerful kick from the painting.https://www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth/grunewald/crucifixion/crucifixion.jpg Well yes but all abstractions, commentary, and generalizations on anything are inherently untrue because they are not the experience itself and are not the thing itself. They are anyway useful insofar as they enable us to discuss and theorize which is both useful and interesting.
Well thought out and I find it interesting and useful.
I think folks are missing the point that Oscar had been making, which I believe to be the difference that marks what the subject is (noun) and what its emotional factor (the verb) is. Perhaps a measure of its kinetic energy, if it has any?LuLa posts many nouns, relatively few verbs.Rob
And the verbes are nuked before pronounced.
