And yet by starting this thread you are asking us to do just that.
;-)
No, I'm not buying that interpretation at all.
I am not asking anyone to choose between either digital or film, neither am I suggesting one is better than the other. I'm suggesting they are such different animals, especially after the click, that they have
ceased to be comparable.
Slobodan's shot at incredible (in film terms) ISO shows that the departure from the traditional sense of photography has perhaps started even
before processing, though I am inclined to discount that idea and believe it is still photography up to the point of capture.
Stretch it much further, and then you have to admit the case for X-Rays and Echo scans as well as thermal imaging devices to be welcomed into the realm of photography, if only because you can see an image.
Rob