At least we know he is a photographer. I'd bet the results he'd get from using those pawn shop cameras would put most supercomputer camera wielding contributors here to shame.
Thanks for the defence, Keith, but as you know from your own long experience, it's what's in your head at the time that counts.
For myself, the less I have to consider apart from how the the image looks, the better!
Another poster writes:
1. "So you equate being a photographer by the gear they use. Interesting.
2. I guess then "real drivers" were back in the 60's and today's drivers with their computerized vehicles are just wannabes. And I guess those scientists that run simulations on computers when they are designing rockets are not "real scientists" since the "real scientists" used slide rulers to do their computations.
I always get a kick out of the cave dwellers when they emerge into today's world." ... chez
........................
1. How this conclusion is arrived at is anybody's guess; mine would be that it's due to a half-grasped interpretation that is only half-grasped because the mind was unable to go further into the true meaning of the post because of a panic reaction of recognition that blurred the rest of the message. Happens all over the place, especially in ancient locked threads. (In relation to which, I recommend reading Margaret Atwood's
The Handmaid's Tale.)
2. I gather the reference to drivers was about those who race? If so, then perhaps not such a clever one. If driving skill is related to man's ability to handle a vehicle, then I fail to grasp how making the vehicle more capable of taking care of itself adds to the skills of the driver. But what do cave-dwellers know, especially those from Scotland? Need to consult a certain J. Stewart for that information.
;-)
