Those simpletonistic ideas are not difficult to grasp, even without reading, as they’ve been around in other articles. Nothing new.
Ah yes, all those other articles you didn't read; nothing new.
What you are basically arguing is that caging 1000 children is ok, but 2000 isn’t.
Yes, that and so much more. But your inability to read that of others and utter lack of compassion already proven multiple times here provides evidence that we will get nowhere in this thread, much like the one on climate change.
The difference at least in this post and the two sides is one side provides outside reference with the idea/desire the other side will read and comment (agree/disagree and why). One side has compassion for yes, that
additional 1000 children Trump has caged in just two months! One side understands the intent of Obama and the intent of Trump and the results of that intent. I don't expect you to understand
any of what I've written or expect that you even read it. Hopefully others will and attempt to engage in what this silly forum is intended for but rarely produces.