Yes, do tell us about how your eyes adapt when the spike in the spectrum of lights you are ignoring affects OBAs in papers among the other issues with such lighting.
CRI numbers are and indication, higher is better, but only a rough one. LEDs are spikey and the key question that determines how well they work with a specific printer is the way the spikes interact with the inks and color matching functions. While that is a non-trivial thing to evaluate it's pretty easy if you have an I1Pro spectro and I1Profiler. You can capture the LED spectrum with the spectro. Load it into I1Profiler, and make a special profile using that illuminant as well as a standard one using the default D50.
To visually compare the effect of the LED v D50 in Photoshop, take an image and convert it to one printer profile. Make a copy. Now
assign the other printer profile to the copy. Now just click back and forth between the two image tabs. The places the image changes colors will show the effects of the LED v D50. (D50 is VERY close to Solux profiles). If you want to see just how bad industrial fluorescent lighting is do the same with T2 illuminant.
Having measured the spectrums from various supposed high color rendering LEDs, including Hyperikons, they all have negligible uV. Which means they should be used with OBA free paper or M2 based profiles with any paper containing OBAs. Fluorescent lights, OTOH, typically have uV to various degrees so you may also need to consider a M0 ro M1 profile for those.