Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Feedback  (Read 2019 times)

verma_deepak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 43
  • Deepak
Feedback
« on: November 16, 2017, 01:13:29 pm »

Hi,

Please provide feedback on below images...interpret them the way suites to the mood.
Logged

thierrylegros396

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1925
Re: Feedback
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2017, 05:35:30 am »

The 1st is imbalanced because of the black on the bottom feft.

I prefer the 2nd one.

Thierry
Logged

JNB_Rare

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1041
    • JNB54
Re: Feedback
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2017, 09:37:37 am »

The 1st is imbalanced because of the black on the bottom left.

Thierry

The black at bottom left appears to be a face (selfie?). I like the composition of the first one better with respect to the trees. But, for me, the face doesn't seem to add to the interest or the mystery or the mood of the picture.
Logged

verma_deepak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 43
  • Deepak
Re: Feedback
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2017, 11:32:40 am »

Thanks, face included accidently...i should have cropped it out or masked it..let me try ..
Logged

verma_deepak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 43
  • Deepak
Re: Feedback
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2017, 12:59:29 pm »

What is your views on this reprocessed image
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 21513
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Feedback
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2017, 03:42:31 pm »

Much better balance now.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

DougDolde

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 188
    • Images of the American West
Re: Feedback
« Reply #6 on: November 17, 2017, 03:55:22 pm »

Not very compelling in any form
Logged

verma_deepak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 43
  • Deepak
Re: Feedback
« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2017, 05:37:01 am »

Thanks DougDolde,

You mean second image in both form or both image in any form are not apealing ?
Logged

Alskoj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 408
Re: Feedback
« Reply #8 on: November 18, 2017, 06:55:50 am »

Did you take them with a phone?  Tell us what you like about them. 
Logged

pegelli

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1664
    • http://pegelli.smugmug.com/
Re: Feedback
« Reply #9 on: November 18, 2017, 06:58:54 am »

The reprocessed image shows some ill-executed botchy cloning blemishes which makes it unusable in my mind.

The composition is now best of the three, but still not very appealing
Logged
pieter, aka pegelli

verma_deepak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 43
  • Deepak
Re: Feedback
« Reply #10 on: November 18, 2017, 03:48:52 pm »

These are from P65+ ,

The first one was more to show tall-ness of the tree and texture of the bark, second one to induce the feeling of seeing sky in a jungle...

What could have been a better composition...I can fix patch work an all so more inclined to understand what could have been location of elements
Logged

verma_deepak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 43
  • Deepak
Re: Feedback
« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2017, 03:51:01 pm »

Apologies, I am just a newbe and intend to learn from gurus hence request for feedback on substandard pics, please help improve my images
Logged

Walt Roycraft

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 442
    • roycraftart
Re: Feedback
« Reply #12 on: November 18, 2017, 04:30:05 pm »

As others said, not appealing as a typical landscape image. BUT, I think the first one with the face included should be title "Tree Selfie" and I think that works for an interest shot.
Logged
Walter Roycraft
http://www.roycraftart.c

Peter McLennan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4342
Re: Feedback
« Reply #13 on: November 18, 2017, 07:51:06 pm »

Verma, if your intent was to show the texture of the bark, then those images appear to be at least two stops underexposed. If your intention was to depict the silhouettes of the trees, you've succeeded.  The previous comments regarding black areas and compositional balance are valid, IMO.
Logged

maddogmurph

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1073
    • Maddog's Photography
Re: Feedback
« Reply #14 on: November 18, 2017, 10:09:01 pm »

**Yawn**
Logged
Maddog Murph
www.depictionsofbeauty.com
Mostly here for constructive feedback.

verma_deepak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 43
  • Deepak
Re: Feedback
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2017, 03:01:48 am »

Thanks a ton guys...I will help me improve
Logged

farbschlurf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 636
    • fototypo
Re: Feedback
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2017, 04:43:03 am »

I try to make similar photos from time to time. The same trees grow a lot in the area around the city, so I have an idea of the scene. (Where is it, btw?) But I found there're a hard subject.

I think the first one "with the sky" would benefit if there would be something in the sky! Imagine the same picture with some clouds. Much more interesting.
The 2nd might gain something with softer light, maybe. Others commented on the deep shadows. Some clouds would be nice here, too, for me.
Somehow this is also a matter of taste, maybe you like the (good) gradient in the sky a lot, I'd rather prefer something with clouds.
:-)
Logged

verma_deepak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 43
  • Deepak
Re: Feedback
« Reply #17 on: November 19, 2017, 01:03:37 pm »

Thanks a ton...its in India...one of northen most state...i would like to have some cloud in sky in my next click..
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up