Hi Jim,
I don't disagree, and have changed the wording of the original posting.
At the time of the original posting I paid some consideration to the issue, and I felt that the simplification was OK. I have changed my mind.
BTW, I just made a small experiment:
- Take a decently sharp 42 MP image
- Downsize it to 50%
- upsize it to 200%
- Print both the images at A2 or 16"x23" size
I have done that, using Photoshop CS. The results were interesting. The downscaled and upscaled image was actually looking sharper, but it had a lot of "grittyness" to it. The original image was more smooth.
In an experiment like this there would be a lot of variables. Eyesight, experience in viewing prints, etc. But, it is quite interesting...
Best regards
Erik
I would say that is confusing.
What would you say if someone took a pair of 7x50 binoculars and advertised them as 49x50?
Jim