Sorry gals...
Trump Pulls Back Obama-Era Protections For Women Workers
Yeah, so how is that gonna help make America great again? Trump wants companies with federal contracts to NOT have to comply with 14 labor and civil rights laws? Probably not gonna make those women who voted for Trump happy that they voted for him.
Jeff, perhaps if, instead of huffing and puffing and stomping his feet around, Obama worked with congress in the last 6 years, laws, instead of just orders, would have gotten passed. You know, sort of like George W Bush and Bill Clinton did.
This is the problem with our current situation, not that we have strong opinions on either side, but that the executive office has over reached in the past couple of presidencies, especially with Obama. Trump is just putting the natural order of things back in place.
(This is why he choose all of those "unqualified" appointees. I certainly agree most of them are unqualified to run those organizations, like the EPA and Dept. of Education, but they are all qualified to deregulate them, which is what their purpose is.)
Congress is suppose to create laws through compromise; we are not suppose to be force feed executive orders from a president voted into office by one side. This does nothing but create dissidents, and puts us ever closer to another 1861. This is why I am also for states rights, not because I support the crazy ideas coming out of some of them, but because it is impossible to run a country with such a large geography and peoples under a strong federal government in the long run. In this situation, Civil War becomes inevitable.
Sure Norway, the pinnacle for all the leftists, does it, but then again Norway is small and pretty much consisted of one people. We are not small nor consist of only one people.
Insofar as the equal pay argument, it has been debunked several times. As someone with mathematics degrees and significantly higher understanding of statistics then the average person, I consider the left's argument here to be a great example of "liars figure and figures lies."
If you look at a sample of men and women, with the sample of men
stratified to the sample of women according to job title and years experience, not all men vs. all women, which is statistically inequivalent according to the merits of the study, the wage gap all but disappears.
Not to the mention the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (passed by congress I should mention, not executive order) already grants equal pay for equal work and qualifications regardless of sex.
My other half laughs at this all of the time. In the world of commercial photography, women make less then men. However, almost all commercial photographers are self-employed, so it really has nothing to do with discrimination, and all with negotiations. She, has on several occasions, gotten much more then I would have tried for with a certain project.