Pages: 1 ... 98 99 [100] 101 102 ... 331   Go Down

Author Topic: Trump II  (Read 918437 times)

Alan Goldhammer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4344
    • A Goldhammer Photography
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1980 on: April 01, 2017, 11:50:25 am »

Mostly to do with electronics and infrastructure. Here are some links for US DoD contracts with Siemens.

Cheers,
Bart
they also make quiet running engines.
Logged

Peter McLennan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4690
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1981 on: April 01, 2017, 12:22:29 pm »

Another biased hit job on Trump.

You'll have to offer a better refutation than that.
Unlike Fox News, the Economist is one of the world's most universally respected journals.
Logged

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1982 on: April 01, 2017, 01:42:07 pm »

You'll have to offer a better refutation than that.
Unlike Fox News, the Economist is one of the world's most universally respected journals.

It doesn't matter what the journal is considered.  The link is to an opinion/op-ed article within their magazine.  Opinions by their very nature are biased.  The opinion they presented was mostly a hit job on Trump. 

Schewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6229
    • http:www.schewephoto.com
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1983 on: April 01, 2017, 03:09:57 pm »

Opinions by their very nature are biased.  The opinion they presented was mostly a hit job on Trump.

And...that magazine is noted for being very unbiased. It's merely YOUR opinion–which has already proven to be blindly biased in favor of Trump–that the op/ed is biased. In point of fact, they very deftly eviscerated Trump's actions and inactions...he's not draining the swamp, he's simply repopulating it in his likeness...he's not repealing/replacing Obamacare, he's moving on to tax reform–which has been made harder now. He's had two attempts to ban muslims rebuked. He's pissed off friends and enemies alike yet still loves Putin in spite of all evidence that Putin is out to get us. The only thing he's done is go EO-happy by signing a bunch of stuff to do and/or undo that he's unlikely to have read or understood...

See, the sad thing is, if somebody actually tells the truth about Trump and what's he's doing, it's a hit job by the unfair lying media...uh, no, The Economist just point out what a failure his first 70 days in office has been.

If that's a hit job, then by your standard, there can be no reporting of what Trump says or does won't be a hit job...

Quote
DONALD TRUMP won the White House on the promise that government is easy. Unlike his Democratic opponent, whose career had been devoted to politics, Mr Trump stood as a businessman who could Get Things Done. Enough voters decided that boasting, mocking, lying and grabbing women were secondary. Some Trump fans even saw them as the credentials of an authentic, swamp-draining saviour.

After 70 days in office, however, Mr Trump is stuck in the sand. A health-care bill promised as one of his “first acts” suffered a humiliating collapse in the—Republican-controlled—Congress (see Lexington). His repeated attempts to draft curbs on travel to America from some Muslim countries are being blocked by the courts. And suspicions that his campaign collaborated with Russia have cost him his national security adviser and look likely to dog his administration (see article). Voters are not impressed. No other president so early in his first term has suffered such low approval ratings.

True? Untrue? Hit job?

Quote
The nature of political power is different, too. As owner and CEO of his business, Mr Trump had absolute control. The constitution sets out to block would-be autocrats. Where Mr Trump has acted appropriately—as with his nomination of a principled, conservative jurist to fill a Supreme Court vacancy—he deserves to prevail. But when the courts question the legality of his travel order they are only doing their job. Likewise, the Republican failure to muster a majority over health-care reflects not just divisions between the party’s moderates and hardliners, but also the defects of a bill that, by the end, would have led to worse protection, or none, for tens of millions of Americans without saving taxpayers much money.

Far from taking Washington by storm, America’s CEO is out of his depth. The art of political compromise is new to him. He blurs his own interests and the interests of the nation. The scrutiny of office grates. He chafes under the limitations of being the most powerful man in the world. You have only to follow his incontinent stream of tweets to grasp Mr Trump’s paranoia and vanity: the press lies about him; the election result fraudulently omitted millions of votes for him; the intelligence services are disloyal; his predecessor tapped his phones. It’s neither pretty nor presidential.

True? Untrue? Hit job?

Quote
The character question
The Americans who voted for Mr Trump either overlooked his bombast, or they saw in him a tycoon with the self-belief to transform Washington. Although this presidency is still young, that already seems an error of judgment. His policies, from health-care reform to immigration, have been poor—they do not even pass the narrow test that they benefit Trump voters. Most worrying for America and the world is how fast the businessman in the Oval Office is proving unfit for the job.

True? Untrue? Hit job?

Naw...actually, it's a pretty well articulated assessment of Trump's incompetence so far...

Hit job?

Not so much...the truth hurts don't it?
Logged

Schewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6229
    • http:www.schewephoto.com
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1984 on: April 01, 2017, 03:21:04 pm »

Well, the Trumpster #DumbDonald! is back to name calling...

Trump mocks Chuck Todd's appearance, Russia reporting in Saturday morning tweet

Quote
President Donald Trump went after Chuck Todd and NBC News on Saturday morning, asking when they will stop reporting on "the fake Trump/Russia story."

"When will Sleepy Eyes Chuck Todd and @NBCNews start talking about the Obama SURVEILLANCE SCANDAL and stop with the Fake Trump/Russia story," the president tweeted. Nearly 20 minutes later, he added: "It is the same Fake News Media that said there is "no path to victory for Trump" that is now pushing the phony Russia story. A total scam!"

--snip--

Trump has drawn criticism in the past for mocking reporters' appearances. During the 2016 campaign, Trump mocked New York TImes reporter Serge F. Kovaleski, who has a physical disability. Last July, Trump tweeted about Todd, referring to him as "sleepy eyes."

Todd responded to Trump's tweet, saying he "slept well" and doesn't feel "sleepy at all."

"For those wondering, I slept well even tho I stayed up late watching the #msstate upset of UConn. #cowbell. Don't feel sleepy at all though," Todd wrote.

So, the leader of the free world is still acting like a schoolyard brat and calling people names?

Well, let's call him #DumbDonald!
Logged

Schewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6229
    • http:www.schewephoto.com
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1985 on: April 01, 2017, 03:31:44 pm »

#NewSwamp

Trump Couple, Now White House Employees, Can’t Escape Conflict Laws

Quote
But the financial disclosure report released late Friday for Mr. Kushner, which shows that he and his wife still benefit financially from a real estate and investment empire worth as much as $740 million, makes clear that this most powerful Washington couple is walking on perilous legal and ethical ground, according to several prominent experts on the subject.

Unlike Mr. Trump, who is exempt from conflict of interest laws, both Mr. Kushner and Ms. Trump — who took a formal White House position this past week — are forbidden under federal criminal and civil law to take any action that might benefit their particular financial holdings.

Then there's Bannon...Bannon Made Millions in Shaping Right-Wing Thought

Quote
The personal wealth and holdings of President Trump’s chief strategist, Stephen K. Bannon, were detailed for the first time on Friday in a filing that showed a large chunk of his income coming from right-leaning political news, film and consulting companies.

The filing was included in a huge release of financial disclosures made late Friday evening by the White House, which is obligated to make public the financial assets and income of scores of officials now serving in the Trump administration.

A conservative media impresario and producer of documentary films before joining the Trump campaign, Mr. Bannon has assets worth $11.8 million to $53.8 million, his filing showed.

#SwampRats

#MAGA

Yeah, right...if you believe that, I got a bridge I'll sell you...
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18092
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1986 on: April 01, 2017, 03:35:19 pm »

... Naw...actually, it's a pretty well articulated assessment of Trump's incompetence so far...

+1

LesPalenik

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5339
    • advantica blog
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1987 on: April 01, 2017, 05:03:33 pm »

Cutting budgets is one thing, but erasing valuable scientific data borders on sheer stupidity, ignorance and criminal neglect. Worse than burning bibles.
Since January, Trump's administration has been systematically deleting datasets, webpages and policies about the Arctic.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/mar/28/arctic-researcher-donald-trump-deleting-my-citations
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18092
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1988 on: April 01, 2017, 06:10:38 pm »

Quote
For April Fools' Day, the Russian Foreign Ministry put out an "official joke" - a video of a proposed voice-mail message for its embassy answering machines. In the clip, recorded in Russian and English, an automated recording tells callers to press 1 for "a call from a Russian diplomat to your political opponent." You can press 2 "to use the services of Russian hackers," or 3 "to request election interference."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-russia-april-fools-day-joke-20170401-story.html

 :D

Schewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6229
    • http:www.schewephoto.com
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1989 on: April 01, 2017, 06:51:12 pm »

No joke...

So...then there's this: Trump walks out on signing ceremony without actually signing order

Quote
President Trump walked out on his own Oval Office signing ceremony without actually signing his two executive orders on trade.

Trump's abrupt departure from Friday's ceremony came after a reporter shouted questions about the president's former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, who has offered to testify before Congress on Russian involvement in the U.S. election in return for immunity from prosecution.

If you watch the video, he looked determined to escape the press and made Pence go back to the table and grab the bills and pens.

Poor Donald...he just doesn't seem to be having any fun any more.


Donald Trump’s joyless presidency


Quote
Is President Trump having any fun as the leader of the free world? I ask because sometimes it seems he lets media scrutiny suck all enjoyment out of a job that represents the ultimate fulfillment of his principal goal in life: winning.

--snip--

In office, Trump has appeared highly susceptible to souring by critical coverage. He had been president for all of 75 hours when White House press secretary Sean Spicer described him as demoralized by the media:

The default narrative is always negative, and it’s demoralizing. And I think that when you sit here and you realize the sacrifice the guy made, leaving a very, very successful business because he really cares about this country and he wants — despite your partisan differences, he cares about making this country better for everybody. He wants to make it safer for everybody.

And so when you wake up everyday and that’s what you’re seeing over and over again, and you’re not seeing stories about the Cabinet folks that he’s appointing or the success that he’s having trying to keep American jobs here. Yes, it is a little disappointing.


--snip--

The Washington Post's Philip Rucker, Robert Costa and Ashley Parker (the same Ashley Parker who previously worked with Haberman at the Times) reported in early March that “the president has been seething as he watches round-the-clock cable news coverage.”

Their story chronicled the extent to which Trump's spirits rise and fall, according to the news cycle: up amid praise for his first address to Congress, down a day later, when The Post reported on undisclosed campaign-year conversations between Jeff Sessions, now the attorney general, and Russia's ambassador to the United States. Up again when the media covered Trump's unsubstantiated accusation of wiretapping by former president Barack Obama, back down when the Sunday political talk shows featured Republicans unwilling to defend the baseless charge.

It's almost enough for me to feel sorry for him...then I remember all the crap he's said and done and that sympathy dries right up.
Logged

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1990 on: April 01, 2017, 07:46:18 pm »

For April Fools' Day, the Russian Foreign Ministry put out an "official joke" - a video of a proposed voice-mail message for its embassy answering machines. In the clip, recorded in Russian and English, an automated recording tells callers to press 1 for "a call from a Russian diplomat to your political opponent." You can press 2 "to use the services of Russian hackers," or 3 "to request election interference."
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-russia-april-fools-day-joke-20170401-story.html

 :D
Fake news.  The Republicans must have planted that article.

LesPalenik

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5339
    • advantica blog
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1991 on: April 01, 2017, 08:05:41 pm »

From the newest Spiegel article:

The US President has his own relationship to facts, denies climate change and sees environmental protection as an industrial obstacle. Donald Trump's policy scares many scientists in the US. They are afraid of the attacks on universities, some even from a departure from rationality.

Thanks to the Brexit and Trump's choice, a lot more top scientists are interested in German universities. If foreign scientists leave the country, hopefully this will be a wake-up call for the US. On the other hand, Germany as a science location in Europe will benefit enormously.


Contrast the current US science cutback with the ambitious German science program.
The most expensive scientific experiment ever in Germany - eight years of construction, costing more than 1.2 billion euros: This year, the brightest X-ray source in the world is to be put into operation at Hamburg.
International research groups will decipher here atomic details of viruses and cells, filming chemical reactions and gaining insights into the interior of planets.
Researchers will be able to eject the electrons through the accelerator tunnel and accelerate the particles slowly but surely to near-light speed. Then come the so-called undulators employed to generate X-rays using the electrons in the 200-meter-long device.


http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/technik/roentgenlaser-european-xfel-besuch-bei-deutschlands-teuerstem-experiment-a-1135736.html
German text only, accompanied by really cool, high quality images (couldn't find English version of the document yet, but Google Translate may help).
Logged

LesPalenik

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5339
    • advantica blog
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1992 on: April 01, 2017, 08:13:35 pm »

For April Fools' Day, the Russian Foreign Ministry put out an "official joke" - a video of a proposed voice-mail message for its embassy answering machines. In the clip, recorded in Russian and English, an automated recording tells callers to press 1 for "a call from a Russian diplomat to your political opponent." You can press 2 "to use the services of Russian hackers," or 3 "to request election interference."
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-russia-april-fools-day-joke-20170401-story.html :D

This will surely divert attention from the current anti-corruption protests in Russia.
Logged

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1993 on: April 01, 2017, 09:16:57 pm »

Contrast the current US science cutback with the ambitious German science program.
The most expensive scientific experiment ever in Germany - eight years of construction, costing more than 1.2 billion euros: This year, the brightest X-ray source in the world is to be put into operation at Hamburg.
International research groups will decipher here atomic details of viruses and cells, filming chemical reactions and gaining insights into the interior of planets.
Researchers will be able to eject the electrons through the accelerator tunnel and accelerate the particles slowly but surely to near-light speed. Then come the so-called undulators employed to generate X-rays using the electrons in the 200-meter-long device.


http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/technik/roentgenlaser-european-xfel-besuch-bei-deutschlands-teuerstem-experiment-a-1135736.html
German text only, accompanied by really cool, high quality images (couldn't find English version of the document yet, but Google Translate may help).
Les, That looks like a wonderful science program.  I wish the Germans a lot of sucess.  I'm sure we'll all benefit by the research.  Regarding Trump, yes, he's going to cut some R&D, most of it relating to climate change.  There may be other changes as well.  But America's R&D will still be pretty major and probably biggest in the world overall.  I hope so anyway.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending

They say he's going to increase NASA and space R&D.  NASA has a soft spot in my heart having grown up at the dawn of the space age, Apollo, the moon, etc.  It's the one of the few areas I like government spending.  But interestingly, private space exploration has taken off with Space-X and others being paid for by rich companies and individuals.  They're making better products at cheaper cost, the advantages of competition you didn't have when the government was the only game in town. 

Anyway, having studied the German language in college, and stopped after getting a D and an F, I don't think too many Americans will go to Germany looking for jobs in science.  Well maybe in climatology.  :)

LesPalenik

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5339
    • advantica blog
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1994 on: April 01, 2017, 09:34:36 pm »

Les, That looks like a wonderful science program.  I wish the Germans a lot of sucess.  I'm sure we'll all benefit by the research.  Regarding Trump, yes, he's going to cut some R&D, most of it relating to climate change.  There may be other changes as well.  But America's R&D will still be pretty major and probably biggest in the world overall.  I hope so anyway.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending

They say he's going to increase NASA and space R&D.  NASA has a soft spot in my heart having grown up at the dawn of the space age, Apollo, the moon, etc.  It's the one of the few areas I like government spending.  But interestingly, private space exploration has taken off with Space-X and others being paid for by rich companies and individuals.  They're making better products at cheaper cost, the advantages of competition you didn't have when the government was the only game in town. 

Anyway, having studied the German language in college, and stopped after getting a D and an F, I don't think too many Americans will go to Germany looking for jobs in science.  Well maybe in climatology.  :)

Maybe not many Americans. But quite a few Europeans and also some returning Germans who were initially attracted to the US research facilities. I've read several Brexit related reports about UK engineers and scientists who want to live and work in Germany (and other EU countries). A good friend of mine with a PhD from Berkeley spent most of his IT career with Siemens in Germany.

Edited: One reason could be that in many European countries you are entitled to 6 weeks of paid vacations and you get to ski in Dolomites.
« Last Edit: April 01, 2017, 09:59:02 pm by LesPalenik »
Logged

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1995 on: April 01, 2017, 09:46:49 pm »

#NewSwamp

Trump Couple, Now White House Employees, Can’t Escape Conflict Laws

Then there's Bannon...Bannon Made Millions in Shaping Right-Wing Thought

#SwampRats

#MAGA

Yeah, right...if you believe that, I got a bridge I'll sell you...
So we only want to elect poor folks who haven't accomplished anything or know much to make major decisions about the running of our economy and government. Sure won't be any conflict there. Maybe we have to take a chance and hire rich, bright, creative and effective people who know how to execute and then hold their feet to the fire to make sure there are no conflicts.
 
All this gnashing of teeth from liberals and the elite about Trump when the Clintons were selling their souls for speaking engagements to give rich people, companies, and sovereigns access to their power.

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1996 on: April 01, 2017, 10:03:48 pm »

Maybe not many Americans. But quite a few Europeans and also some returning Germans who were initially attracted to the US research facilities. I've read several Brexit related reports about UK engineers and scientists who want to live and work in Germany (and other EU countries). A good friend of mine with a PhD from Berkeley spent most of his IT career with Siemens in Germany.
 
 
Yeah, but we got Wernher von Braun from Germany for NASA.  And a bunch more.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip#Key_members_of_Operation_Paperclip_.28incomplete_list.29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_German_aerospace_engineers_in_the_United_States

Peter McLennan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4690
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1997 on: April 01, 2017, 10:11:38 pm »

They say he's going to increase NASA and space R&D.  NASA has a soft spot in my heart...

He's selectively defunding satellites that look at Earth.  Good luck defending this.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trump-budget-cuts-ldquo-critical-rdquo-nasa-climate-missions/



Logged

LesPalenik

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5339
    • advantica blog
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1998 on: April 01, 2017, 10:13:18 pm »

Yeah, but we got Wernher von Braun from Germany for NASA.  And a bunch more.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip#Key_members_of_Operation_Paperclip_.28incomplete_list.29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_German_aerospace_engineers_in_the_United_States

True! But in the Wernher von Braun's era nobody thought that one day Americans will be buying cars made in Korea and computers made in Taiwan. And using Russian rockets to commute to ISS.
Logged

LesPalenik

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5339
    • advantica blog
Re: Trump II
« Reply #1999 on: April 01, 2017, 10:29:28 pm »

He's selectively defunding satellites that look at Earth.  Good luck defending this.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trump-budget-cuts-ldquo-critical-rdquo-nasa-climate-missions/

Wow!

(shortened extract)
The cancelled OCO-3 mission would address previous OCO-2 limitations: The idea is to use spare parts from OCO-2 and mount them on the International Space Station, which would allow the instrument to be pointed at any spot on Earth to, for example, measure emissions from different cities or detect signs of drought stress in crops before such signs become visible to the naked eye. The orbit of the ISS also precesses, meaning it passes over the same spot at different times of the day, allowing the instrument to see how carbon fluxes change with the time of day.
Because the parts for OCO-3 already exist, the mission is essentially ready to go after some routine testing. It would likely be launched on a commercial rocket already making a resupply trip to the station. These factors make it a relatively cheap mission, with a total cost target of about $115 million to build, launch and operate the instrument for three years.


Compare it with the cost of ads for 2017 Super Bowl - $5 million for 30 seconds or $150 millions for 15 minutes of Super Bowl ads. It shows the Make America Great priorities.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 98 99 [100] 101 102 ... 331   Go Up