That's the whole purpose of spreading Fake news, Alternative facts, it's a tactic of spreading disinformation.
I always understood that this spreading of disinformation had the intent of manipulating public opinion. Once the channels become flooded, an entirely new problem surfaces: the fact that it is (or at least used to be) the job of journalism to separate the wheat from the chaff, and whether they are able to do so properly. This is a separate issue from "investigative journalism", since they already use the framing as presented by respective sides, like naming a "temporary travel ban" a "Muslim ban" when you already pointed out that not all muslims are targeted (nor deported for that matter). It is very interesting to read the original EXO, which includes for example the protection against revenge crimes.
Or singling out stories of individual cases, however sad, bad, or contorted they may be, where they are not relevant to a larger policy institution. This by the way is something typical of recent times, where you even see this happening in national politics.
I don't want national politicians to focus on individual cases. In fact, it should be, and may even already be, illegal, if you think about that.
And when a Judge finds your policy not legally supported, it doesn't mean he/she is against the policy, it should merely be a state of legal facts that some policy doesn't have the correct legal bases or implementation (yet).
