Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: standing firm  (Read 1081 times)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8963
    • site
standing firm
« on: June 20, 2016, 02:58:11 pm »

Thoughts?

Jeremy
Logged

philaitman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 232
Re: standing firm
« Reply #1 on: June 21, 2016, 04:26:47 am »

I'm a big fan of black negative space, but I'm not sure if the black beach adds anything to this -aside from required space to place the sea stack into a more pleasing position compositionally-
the black makes the bottom of the image feel too heavy. If there happened to be a little more detail in that area, just the odd trail of water it would change it's weight considerably.

Lovely light, perfect shutter speed for the water movement and a great sea stack.
Logged

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: standing firm
« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2016, 09:24:03 am »

I'm a big fan of black negative space, but I'm not sure if the black beach adds anything to this -aside from required space to place the sea stack into a more pleasing position compositionally-
the black makes the bottom of the image feel too heavy. If there happened to be a little more detail in that area, just the odd trail of water it would change it's weight considerably.

Lovely light, perfect shutter speed for the water movement and a great sea stack.

Nicely summed up.

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: standing firm
« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2016, 01:39:29 pm »

I'm a big fan of black negative space, but I'm not sure if the black beach adds anything to this -aside from required space to place the sea stack into a more pleasing position compositionally-
the black makes the bottom of the image feel too heavy. If there happened to be a little more detail in that area, just the odd trail of water it would change it's weight considerably.

Lovely light, perfect shutter speed for the water movement and a great sea stack.
I tend to agree.
However, I suspect this was taken near Vik, where the beach is indeed very black, so It might be hard to pull any detail out of it.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8963
    • site
Re: standing firm
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2016, 03:03:56 pm »

I tend to agree.
However, I suspect this was taken near Vik, where the beach is indeed very black, so It might be hard to pull any detail out of it.

You're right, Eric: the sand is very, very black. I've looked closely at the original and it's possible to bring a tiny amount of detail only by raising the sand to a mid to dark grey, which looks wrong.

Phil, I felt the black gave it an anchor, but I can see your point. Perhaps I'll remove a little of it. That was about the furthest the waves were coming that day.

Rajan, I thought this was Kirkjufjara beach but searching on the net makes me wonder if it's Reynisfjara, a bit further east. Do you know?

Jeremy
Logged

MattBurt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3924
  • Looking for that other shot
    • Matt Burt Photography
Re: standing firm
« Reply #5 on: June 21, 2016, 03:51:11 pm »

I think the black sand tells us where this is. Making it grey would be wrong so I say leave it even if it is a bit of an eye magnet.
The shutter speed was perfect and the monolith is an interesting subject.
Logged
-MattB

David Eckels

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3528
  • It's just a camera.
    • Website
Re: standing firm
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2016, 05:35:53 pm »

I know I am going to get sh*t for this, but you could try an 8x10 crop to minimize the black beach a little and also the uninteresting part of the sky. Otherwise, I do find the monolith and the your shutter speed viz the water very intriguing.

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: standing firm
« Reply #7 on: June 22, 2016, 04:22:19 am »

I know I am going to get sh*t for this, but you could try an 8x10 crop to minimize the black beach a little and also the uninteresting part of the sky. Otherwise, I do find the monolith and the your shutter speed viz the water very intriguing.

I am not against a crop but why an aspect crop instead of cropping to content?

philaitman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 232
Re: standing firm
« Reply #8 on: June 22, 2016, 04:44:33 am »

Oh absolutely don't make the sand grey :)
I wasn't sure if there was a touch more texture hiding in there if there isn't, there isn't.
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: standing firm
« Reply #9 on: June 22, 2016, 11:25:04 am »

After several viewings I think the only thing I would change is to crop down from the top, eliminating all of the blank sky above the clouds.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: standing firm
« Reply #10 on: June 22, 2016, 02:46:04 pm »

Then you could crop from the bottom to eliminate the ocean and you'd have a nice narrow cloud picture. Don't want to be left out of the post-processing suggestion torrent.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8963
    • site
Re: standing firm
« Reply #11 on: June 22, 2016, 03:40:47 pm »

Then you could crop from the bottom to eliminate the ocean and you'd have a nice narrow cloud picture. Don't want to be left out of the post-processing suggestion torrent.

 ;)

Jeremy
Logged

David Eckels

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3528
  • It's just a camera.
    • Website
Re: standing firm
« Reply #12 on: June 30, 2016, 08:17:51 am »

I am not against a crop but why an aspect crop instead of cropping to content?
Hi Robert. No particular reason. I tend to like the 8x10 on vertical orientations because they don't look so tall and skinny. Personal preference only.
Pages: [1]   Go Up