Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Free Art for Exposure  (Read 2138 times)

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18091
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Free Art for Exposure
« on: May 16, 2016, 02:40:33 pm »

Nothing to add:

mbaginy

  • Guest
Re: Free Art for Exposure
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2016, 03:03:49 pm »

Can't but shake my head at the Sainsbury ad.

A great response!
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Free Art for Exposure
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2016, 03:12:59 pm »

Looks as if Sainsbury has trouble with English grammar.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18091
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Free Art for Exposure
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2016, 04:29:23 pm »

Looks as if Sainsbury has trouble with English grammar.

They must have used a volunteer proofreader ;)

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Free Art for Exposure
« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2016, 05:00:58 pm »

I prefer the version on the right, because I suspect the left-hand version has been Photoshopped!   >:(
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Colorado David

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1178
Re: Free Art for Exposure
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2016, 10:59:59 pm »

I really like the response, but can't help but think the original is a fake. There are simply too many grammar errors to have actually passed any sort of editing and been published.

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8965
    • site
Re: Free Art for Exposure
« Reply #7 on: May 17, 2016, 03:36:34 am »

I really like the response, but can't help but think the original is a fake. There are simply too many grammar errors to have actually passed any sort of editing and been published.

I wish. That's stunningly good compared to most of the illiterate garbage published by large institutions in England.

Jeremy
Logged

drmike

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 988
    • On Flickr:
Re: Free Art for Exposure
« Reply #8 on: May 17, 2016, 01:04:43 pm »

Examples? While I am sometimes irritated by a few releases it's not that frequent really. But of course I may well be illiterate :)
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Free Art for Exposure
« Reply #9 on: May 19, 2016, 04:08:42 am »

I wish. That's stunningly good compared to most of the illiterate garbage published by large institutions in England.

Jeremy


Agreed. I remember being in a bank in Scotland one day, lookiing at one of its posters and, when it was my turn at the cashier's window, telling her of my objections to the wording. She looked at me blankly.

Can't think of them now, but there are indeed many bloopers in advertising Engish. I also see them quite often on those straplines beneath tv news items... as bad, those lines often hide the very thing the tv film is trying to present! I'm not a fan, but watching golf results is often an example: you seldom catch the little white thing vanishing into the hole: it just goes behind the strapline.

I think those devices (straplines) are actually designed to hide cleavage: part of the political correctness thing, destroying my simple pleasures as well as defeating the kind efforts of those women who do their best with what they have.

Bah!

Rob C
Pages: [1]   Go Up