Greens look particularly garish (as it did on the bamboo path shot in another post), followed by oranges. The third offender is the magenta cast in the mountain reflection.
The oranges and reds certainly look strong, but the greens seen to be bordering on drab - even dropping saturation by 10 points in Photoshop seems to make them unacceptably so on my display. What magenta cast? Looks orange to me...
The sky and the mountain look reasonably correct.
Interestingly, the mountain was by far the most heavily-processed part of the entire photo - heavily desaturated and darkened (from a bright blue in the original) and contrast increased, to account for the atmospheric haze. The hill on the right, with all the vegetation, was barely touched.
Right now I am looking at it on an iPad Air 2 Retina and Safari. Looks the same in Chrome on the same device. Over time, I've come to trust iPad as a good indicator of a "correct" web reproduction precisely because it doesn't allow people to fiddle with its color. Plus it matches rather closely my calibrated monitor.
It looks great on my Sony Xperia phone and mildly undersaturated in Photoshop, but way oversaturated in Firefox on a wide-gamut monitor. I haven't tried printing it yet, but other images which look similar seem t turn out well in print. With different opinions from different people using different monitors, and looking oversaturated on some of my displays, correct in others and even undersaturated in one or two, I have no idea who or what to believe any more with regards to saturation.
