The question is not that simple as a poster probably is a lot more demanding than a billboard simply because it is viewed from a closer position. A few years ago many top quality billboards were done with a 2mp or 3mp Coolpix. Billboards are typically printed at 10 or 15 dpi, 20 at most, so a 2mp image might go to 10 or 15 feet with no problem. This is more than adequate since they are viewed at a distance. I've even seen 1mp images printed 2 feet by 3 feet that were stunning from 8 or 10 feet away. Of course in general the more pixels the better but
here's an example of a 3 foot by 4 foot poster I did from a ~2mp crop from a 1D shot. This was for the back of a trade show booth and from the 8 foot or so viewing distance that the customer was at it left absolutely nothing to be desired and the vendor received many comments and wows about the quality.
So bottom line, it's all relative to viewing distance and proper technique, but a 1DII should be able to easily handle any of these for ordinary purposes, although of course not showing the same detail or bearing as close examination as a similar print from a digital back. Where it might fall down is doing a large mural in a gallery where it may be viewed from a close position.
There also is a big subjective factor as to what your expectations are, what you consider acceptible, and the nature of the image. I've seen many 6 foot film prints in galleries priced at several thousand dollars where I'm sure the technical quality could easily be exceeded by a similar shot/print from a camera such as the 1DII, but that didn't seem to deter the artist, gallery, or purchasers.
- DL