Hi Morgan,
I will admit to being confused too.
My cameras are great. The situation I am referring to is getting accurate colours under varying light conditions which could be chaning CT in natural light or varied brands (ages?) of strobe.
We all know that the first simple step to achieving this is popping a grey card into the frame. (I guess we have all been doing grey clicks for 13 years which is why I found BVWs post a little patronising)
Now,
possibly wrongly, I have always been under the impression that instead of using a grey card a higher degree of accuracy can be achieved by using a Macbeth (or other) card that has a selection of known reference colours and using software to lock to all of those colours.
Consider this mildly fictional situation.
A company designs a product package, maybe it has a key yellow that is 240-200-50 (RGBvalues) the colour the grapics designer and the company agreed.
Now the product is made (a physical item) and photographed
The client then decides the yellow is 'wrong'
Now who is at fault - the photographer? - or is the ink on the product just not the right colour
Has the photographer photographed a faulty product?
Well if we have photographed a card under the same lighting then the yellow patch in the card should read 255 217 0
So if we got our 'official yellow' right then we can suggest that the product is at fault not the photography.
Having drifted away from that part of the business I sold my Sinar.. which had exactly the facility for locking the colour to a card (the back was getting pretty old and clearly modern cheap' DSLRs were 'better'). Of course the business spun round and now we are photographing some exact product for a picky client (beverages/packaging of same)
My simple question was
is there a facility to 'lock to card' in C1?It appears the simple answer is no. (no problem there are scripts in PS to do this I think - and only 5% of our business is that picky)
Now you may want to put me right that locking to a grey card is as accurate as locking to a colour card.. but I doubt it.
S