Not something I have seen.
Well, I have seen. The reason you may have missed that may be that your argumentation may bee poor or lacking…
"CCD is useless for anything other than in studio".
This is the original statement he made that I have a problem with and I will continue to have a problem with.
Sweeping statements that don't hold true for everyone are asinine and those who make them should have the courtesy to present them as personal opinions than facts. Not to mention the continuous attempts at mockery at anyone who dares to think otherwise.
I can absolutely agree that the "CCD is useless for anything other than in studio" is quite a bit sweeping just like all your postings favouring CCDs over CMOS. BTW, both are electron storing devices. You seem to think that electrons stored in CCD capacitors are of better colour than electrons stored in CMOS capacitors.
Actually, I have seen great images made by CCD, CMOS, small format, medium format and even film. The photographer and the subject matters quite a lot more than gear.
Now, "Void" seems to have a foible for long exposures with high scene illumination range. That is a weak point of CCDs. Personally I don't do that kind of photography and I feel that CCD works fine for me. On the other hand, CMOS has less readout noise and less problems with heat building up. It is a newer and better technology replacing an older one. Development resources are of course flowing to the new technology so the possibility of the older technology catching up is quite remote.
The very nice thing with "Void" is that he actually shares raw images. I had some communication with him, as he has experience with several MF backs I don't have access to and he has been most helpful.
Best regards
Erik