Gee Richard, did you luck out or what? Image the chances of attracting the attention of two people who apparently are suffering from hemorrhoids flare-ups on the same day.
I find myself in agreement with Jeffery, but don't see a lot of sense in dumping on someone who asks for feedback.
I'd say the largest problem/shortcoming with the photo is the lack of a subject, something that draws one to look at the picture. Perhaps had you moved closer to the trees in the middle of the image and then used the mountains as a backdrop....
One handy rule to use is that if a picture doesn't grab you then you weren't close enough. (It's not a rule that works for every single picture and may, in fact, not often apply in true "landscapes". But give it a try.)
But the subject doesn't always have to be a 'thing'. Sometimes it can be texture or it can be the light. If this were taken in the fall with the oaks and hickories showing their colors (I grew up around there) then the subject might be color. If you had caught the scene in brilliant sun light just after a wetting rain ....
It's not a bad picture, it's just nothing special. Perhaps it's a picture to be proud of at this state in your 'career'. But I'll bet you do better as you continue to shoot.
