Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: wake  (Read 1372 times)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9262
    • site
wake
« on: May 31, 2024, 08:51:45 am »

Fire away, Slobodan!

Jeremy
Logged

soharaus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 35
Re: wake
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2024, 11:18:38 am »

Not Slobodan .... But I like the symmetry of the foreground broken up by the varying tones and asymmetry of the background.
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18208
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: wake
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2024, 04:40:18 pm »

That shot was done hand-holding a 10-stop  ND!?

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9262
    • site
Re: wake
« Reply #3 on: June 01, 2024, 12:56:39 pm »

The wake, yes: ¼" exposure; the mountains, a little faster.

This one, though, is a straight shot single exposure, handheld with a 10-stop ND at 1/6".

Jeremy
Logged

degrub

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2550
Re: wake
« Reply #4 on: June 01, 2024, 02:19:51 pm »

i like the monochrome version. The colour version excites my vertigo too much.
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18208
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: wake
« Reply #5 on: June 01, 2024, 05:14:57 pm »

Well… ¼s hand-held is not a big deal for today’s image stabilization systems. I thought we were talking about several seconds exposures 😊

Dave (Isle of Skye)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2628
  • I've even written a book about it
    • SkyePhotoGuide.com
Re: wake
« Reply #6 on: June 02, 2024, 10:20:39 am »

Wow, handheld with a 10 stop ND? Amazing!

Must have been a very bright day Jeremy, or you were willing to bump up the ISO, a lot.

But whatever, you managed to take it and it came out well and looks great, so kudos to you my friend  ;)

Dave
Logged

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9262
    • site
Re: wake
« Reply #7 on: June 02, 2024, 11:20:21 am »

Well… ¼s hand-held is not a big deal for today’s image stabilization systems. I thought we were talking about several seconds exposures 😊

Bear in mind I was on a boat, moving quite fast!

Jeremy

PS: Dave, yes, it was a bright day.
Logged

Paulo Bizarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7522
    • http://www.paulobizarro.com
Re: wake
« Reply #8 on: June 05, 2024, 11:16:29 pm »

Well done.

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14432
Re: wake
« Reply #9 on: June 07, 2024, 04:02:33 am »

Both are stunning! I feel drawn into the wakes.
I prefer the first one - monochrome.
Bravo!
Logged
Francois

Chris Kern

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2204
    • Chris Kern's Eponymous Website
Re: wake
« Reply #10 on: June 07, 2024, 11:00:57 am »

Another vote for the monochrome.  Excellent composition and tonality.
Pages: [1]   Go Up