The RZ is 67 no ??
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Regardless of the reasons, having to remove the back and put it back on to change the orientation is for me a big issue.
In studio, on a semi calm day, maybe not that big of a problem, but on location having to go verticle to horizontal continually, it's just not a safe way to change.
I could never do this job by having to remove the back every time I changed the orientation.
[a href=\"http://www.russellrutherford.com/recent_miami/]http://www.russellrutherford.com/recent_miami/[/url]
And digital capture has opened up a whole new level of client expectations of the style and volume of images they expect, even high end campaigns that we use to shoot 2 or 3 set ups a day now have gone to double, triple the set ups.
Now I've only seen drawings of the camera and maybe it has more functionality than I know, but I don't see a right angle grip or button, so even using the prism won't allow for easy verticle shooting without removing the back.
I somewhat don't understand this, as my Contax, Canons and Nikons all make this very easily.
Shooting fast on location is the market db's are trying to address, just like Canon is trying (actually has) moved into the medium format segment.
What good is a 2fps camera if you have to stop and shield the back from the elements, take the back off, put the back on and then resume working?
JR