Luminous Landscape Forum
Equipment & Techniques => Landscape & Nature Photography => Topic started by: sbauschl on December 03, 2014, 10:10:18 pm
-
It's hard to be objective after seeing the same picture for an hour! Let me know which one you like better!
-
The one with the distinct sun orb. The other looks more like a point and shoot result.
-
The one with the distinct sun orb. The other looks more like a point and shoot result.
Likewise.
-
I like the second one much better
-
Plus one on the second one, ;) Regards, Sander
-
It's hard to be objective after seeing the same picture for an hour! Let me know which one you like better!
The second, without doubt.
Jeremy
-
I also vote for image #2…
-
Thanks for all the replies! It helps a lot!
-
For me #1
#2 is more about the sun and the water but #1 is more of a graphic about the vertical and crossed poles and bird. I'm not crazy about all the sky in the shot, probably crop most of it out.
-
I also vote for image #2…
+1
-
The first one: the lines leading to the sun are stronger imho.
-
I like the sun/sky of the second one much better. However I find the second color tone in the water a little distracting.
But, I like the water and single tone of the first one a lot better than the second. It's just the sky feels really over-exposed.
-
I can't decide. But I noticed that I can see the processing in the water on #1 a bit. Initially as small jpgs, I liked #1, but when I looked at the larger image I seemed to favor #2, so I guess it depends on what size you were going with for me.
-
I agree with Walt ... a 3x4 aspect cropping about 1/3 off the top does it for me, (on either shot)
David
-
I like #2 better *the one that someone described as a "distinct orb." I think the first one looks just a tad blown out. Nice image.