Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: Jeremy Roussak on June 29, 2014, 06:29:37 pm

Title: insignificant
Post by: Jeremy Roussak on June 29, 2014, 06:29:37 pm
Thoughts?

Jeremy
Title: Re: insignificant
Post by: luxborealis on June 29, 2014, 10:18:07 pm
Interesting. Very magenta.
Title: Re: insignificant
Post by: francois on June 30, 2014, 08:39:13 am
I like how the shadow seems to point to the boat's wake.
Title: Re: insignificant
Post by: PeterAit on June 30, 2014, 10:04:15 am
Is that the Colorado River in or near Canyonlands? I was out there last year and it sure looks familiar. The boat adds a great sense of scale.
Title: Re: insignificant
Post by: francois on June 30, 2014, 10:28:47 am
Is that the Colorado River in or near Canyonlands? I was out there last year and it sure looks familiar. The boat adds a great sense of scale.

I was not with Jeremy but it looks like it was taken from Dead Horse Point (near the Canyonlands as you rightly guessed).
Title: Re: insignificant
Post by: stamper on June 30, 2014, 10:28:56 am
I see two images in one here. The top half could stand alone as an image and also the bottom half? As it is it appears it is top heavy? The blue shadows seem to me a little saturated. I like the bottom half better. Overall an interesting image that draws your attention more than once. :)
Title: Re: insignificant
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on June 30, 2014, 01:13:05 pm
I see two images in one here. The top half could stand alone as an image and also the bottom half? As it is it appears it is top heavy? The blue shadows seem to me a little saturated. I like the bottom half better. Overall an interesting image that draws your attention more than once. :)
I agree with Stamper. I liked the original but also felt a bit unsettled about it until I read Stamper's comments.

Here are my suggested croppings for top and bottom versions (sorry, Russ):

Eric

P.S. I also find the bottom version more interesting.
Title: Re: insignificant
Post by: RSL on June 30, 2014, 01:25:32 pm
Arrrrggggg. . .!
Title: Re: insignificant
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on June 30, 2014, 02:25:30 pm
Compromise: printing it as a diptych?

As Henry Kissinger said, "Compromise is a solution that leaves both sides equally... unhappy."  ;)
Title: Re: insignificant
Post by: Jeremy Roussak on June 30, 2014, 04:45:30 pm
Thanks for the comments, all.

Here are my suggested croppings for top and bottom versions (sorry, Russ):

Eric, I have as you know a much more relaxed attitude to cropping than Russ and you and I usually find ourselves in agreement. But this time, I'll echo his comment: Arrrrggggg. . .! and add one of mine: No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no!

Your photographs are both interesting, but they're nowhere near what I was aiming for, as my title implied. I wanted a tiny boat, dwarfed by huge cliffs. Your upper crop removes the boat; and your lower, the scale. Your crops are a noble attempt to salvage my failure, if such it be. Sorry.

I was not with Jeremy but it looks like it was taken from Dead Horse Point (near the Canyonlands as you rightly guessed).

Spot on, François. It was a bit late in the morning for the best light, but I'd just been at Mesa Arch and I had to allow time for my hands to defrost.

Interesting. Very magenta.

Not on my screen. I'll recalibrate it when I get a chance. Easily fixed with LR's tone slider, if true, though. Stamper's point about the shadows might end up getting fixed at the same time.

Jeremy
Title: Re: insignificant
Post by: RSL on June 30, 2014, 05:09:39 pm
Eric, I have as you know a much more relaxed attitude to cropping than Russ and you and I usually find ourselves in agreement. But this time, I'll echo his comment: Arrrrggggg. . .! and add one of mine: No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no!

Your photographs are both interesting, but they're nowhere near what I was aiming for, as my title implied. I wanted a tiny boat, dwarfed by huge cliffs. Your upper crop removes the boat; and your lower, the scale.

+1. The solitary boat threatened by the humungous cliffs is what the picture's about. If you remove either there's no story and no picture.
Title: Re: insignificant
Post by: Jeremy Roussak on July 01, 2014, 02:23:24 pm
How about this? I've warmed it up a bit and lowered the magenta (Terry), removed some blue (stamper) and shifted the black point. It seems to have more punch.

Jeremy
Title: Re: insignificant
Post by: francois on July 01, 2014, 02:38:33 pm
The shadows are much better - less blue. I didn't see any serious problem with magenta - but it may be my eyes or display…
Title: Re: insignificant
Post by: Iluvmycam on July 01, 2014, 02:51:08 pm
IT is OK OP.
Title: Re: insignificant
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on July 01, 2014, 03:33:58 pm
Better... it was too magenta, btw.