Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: Christoph C. Feldhaim on February 08, 2014, 01:17:49 pm

Title: Flow No.2
Post by: Christoph C. Feldhaim on February 08, 2014, 01:17:49 pm
Continuing the series ...
Cheers
~Chris



Flow No.2


(http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5549/12389505445_79950b1a04_c.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/feldhaim/12389505445)
Title: Re: Flow No.2
Post by: Jeremy Roussak on February 08, 2014, 06:19:43 pm
Very good, Chris: the central light is really lovely. I wonder if a slightly longer exposure, to smooth the water just a little more, might have been beneficial.

Jeremy
Title: Re: Flow No.2
Post by: Christoph C. Feldhaim on February 08, 2014, 06:26:39 pm
Very good, Chris: the central light is really lovely. I wonder if a slightly longer exposure, to smooth the water just a little more, might have been beneficial.

Jeremy

Thanks!
The central light is from the water being illuminated by the morning sun.
I shot after a wave when the water was retracting and water still splashed in the air.

I am still experimenting with this.
Generally I am not a friend of too silky water.
For flowing water 1/20th of a second is generally good,
but I also go down to a 1/125th When I want some shape and freeze and I will go down to even 1/2000th under certain conditions.
I have planned to explore waves and the sea more - easy here in northern Germany with the baltics and the northern sea nearby.

Cheers
~Chris
Title: Re: Flow No.2
Post by: utahmike on February 08, 2014, 07:42:13 pm
Beautiful. I like the composition of this image more than Flow 1. There's really nice layering at play here, and the spray gives it a sense of movement.

Title: Re: Flow No.2
Post by: Christoph C. Feldhaim on February 09, 2014, 07:55:54 am
Beautiful. I like the composition of this image more than Flow 1. There's really nice layering at play here, and the spray gives it a sense of movement.



Funny - this is exactly the reason why I personally like Flow No.1 a lot - its a more complicated composition, more difficult to balance out.
This one here is much simpler - which is nice and good, but much less of a challenge.
Cheers
~Chris
Title: Re: Flow No.2
Post by: RSL on February 09, 2014, 08:18:20 am
Very good, Chris: the central light is really lovely. I wonder if a slightly longer exposure, to smooth the water just a little more, might have been beneficial.
Jeremy

I agree with Jeremy, Chris, but I think the water is smooth enough.