Luminous Landscape Forum
Equipment & Techniques => Landscape & Nature Photography => Topic started by: batmura on November 09, 2013, 03:36:35 pm
-
#1
(http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2878/10764933033_644e7a1f8f_c.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/batmura/10764933033/)
Riva 4 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/batmura/10764933033/) by batmura (http://www.flickr.com/people/batmura/), on Flickr
#2
(http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2878/10766178496_629625e8f7_c.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/batmura/10766178496/)
Rocks (http://www.flickr.com/photos/batmura/10766178496/) by batmura (http://www.flickr.com/people/batmura/), on Flickr
-
I like how the rocks frame the clouds. The horizon looks like it was etched in, perhaps a little unrealistic? Depends on taste I guess.
Nice milky foreground.
-
Reminds me a bit of very old Star Trek foreign planet setups ...
-
I just added another image. Comments welcome.
-
I prefer the second one. The sense of movement in the clouds contrasts nicely with the stationary rocks.
-
I prefer the second one. The sense of movement in the clouds contrasts nicely with the stationary rocks.
I agree. In the second, the clouds serve a purpose. In the first, they're just there, and I think the image would be better without them.
Jeremy
-
I prefer the second one. The sense of movement in the clouds contrasts nicely with the stationary rocks.
I also prefer the second image and for the same reasons.
-
#2 no doubts for me. The composition of the elements is much more dynamic.