Luminous Landscape Forum

Equipment & Techniques => Landscape & Nature Photography => Topic started by: NickNod on August 07, 2013, 02:39:14 am

Title: Nanking China
Post by: NickNod on August 07, 2013, 02:39:14 am: (https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-TttQNnjEYrE/UgHDbMabx1I/AAAAAAAAAns/3F88QEcVbM8/s489-no/4.jpg)

(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-8KFnng5Gros/UgGW41vkMYI/AAAAAAAAAl4/FT1RKQ63Pjo/s489-no/3215570134042599088.jpg)

(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-HzelkC9Qdu8/UgGpp3QZ0AI/AAAAAAAAAmc/fG-o6NqjCHI/s463-no/6597593134193033337.jpg)
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: NickNod on August 07, 2013, 02:43:43 am: Here is Nick Ding from China. I'd like to share my photos as well as my friends (of course it is authorized) to Lumious Landscape. :)
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: Paulo Bizarro on August 07, 2013, 04:51:43 am: All very poetic and very well done. Welcome and congratulations.
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: Merc on August 07, 2013, 06:03:57 am: I really like these. Wonderful mood.
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: francois on August 07, 2013, 08:01:31 am: Nick,
Welcome to the forum… Thanks for sharing this fantastic set of images.
Bravo!
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on August 07, 2013, 09:57:38 am: Wonderful set of images!
Let me add my welcome to the forum. I hope you'll share more photos.
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: Arlen on August 07, 2013, 01:44:48 pm: Add another welcome to the accumulating list, and words of appreciation for your work. Very captivating and different from the usual fare that we are accustomed to seeing.
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: Jeremy Roussak on August 07, 2013, 02:03:20 pm: Welcome indeed. I like the photos a lot but I can't help feeling that the toning is a little overdone: they're awfully blue.

Jeremy
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: NancyP on August 08, 2013, 09:06:49 pm: I really like #1. Lots of tonalities, textures, and the extra of the birds balancing out the mass of bright sky.
I might not do as intense a toning, but I like the blue.
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: john beardsworth on August 09, 2013, 03:17:29 am: I quite like the images, though are these spam posts?
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: brandtb on August 09, 2013, 07:30:41 am: Quote
though are these spam posts?
+1 ...or info. collecting/phishing
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: Christopher Sanderson on August 09, 2013, 08:23:45 am: MODERATOR'S NOTE

I have removed the commercial URL from the signature line
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: john beardsworth on August 09, 2013, 09:18:30 am: You'll find it's also the OP's web link and is in his blog.

John
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: brandtb on August 09, 2013, 09:34:11 am: Quote
You'll find it's also the OP's web link and is in his blog.
...saw that...most likely trying to get traffic to site via blog
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: john beardsworth on August 09, 2013, 09:42:31 am: I wonder whose photos these really are.
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: brandtb on August 09, 2013, 09:52:15 am: That's what I was thinking... I did like the cleverly disguised blog post..."What Should Be Your Choice while Upgrading Your Photography Equipment
Every photographer wants to upgrade their devices timely. However, due to the reason of short budget, most of us need to meet the question of what item should you upgrade. Lens, camera, or other gadgets like a camera shoulder bag(linked to the website)?
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: john beardsworth on August 09, 2013, 10:05:11 am: LL must attract a better class of spammer than most sites.
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: brandtb on August 09, 2013, 01:01:01 pm: "Nick Ding"...top shelf
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: Jeremy Roussak on August 09, 2013, 01:58:15 pm: Quote from: brandtb on August 09, 2013, 01:01:01 pm
"Nick Ding"...top shelf

No, that's Nick Dong. Easily confused.

Jeremy
Title: Re: Nanking China
Post by: brandtb on August 09, 2013, 05:34:56 pm: Funny you should mention "Dong"...I kept thinking it was "Dong"...but going back to orig. post...realized it was in fact "Ding" and not "Dong"