Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: cjogo on June 24, 2013, 12:15:38 pm

Title: On the Rocks
Post by: cjogo on June 24, 2013, 12:15:38 pm
1988   >> Portrait in the Hills of California ..Rollei Sl 66
Title: Re: On the Rocks
Post by: RSL on June 24, 2013, 04:30:12 pm
Not enough ambiguity to be a really good street shot.
Title: Re: On the Rocks
Post by: nemo295 on June 24, 2013, 07:04:43 pm
Clearly I've been hanging around on the wrong streets.
Title: Re: On the Rocks
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on June 24, 2013, 09:06:14 pm
The potholes suggest it's a street around Boston, but the pedestrian doesn't look like a Bostonian.

But I like the photo.

Eric M.
Title: Re: On the Rocks
Post by: cjogo on June 25, 2013, 01:23:14 am
When you opt to use a tripod and slow film --- you get Amazing candid street shots  ;D
Title: Re: On the Rocks
Post by: Rob C on June 25, 2013, 03:46:56 am
When you opt to use a tripod and slow film --- you get Amazing candid street shots  ;D

Even the waterfalls change direction to peep!

Was this a street in Brazil?

Rob C
Title: Re: On the Rocks
Post by: nemo295 on June 25, 2013, 10:55:45 am

Was this a street in Brazil?


There nothing "Brazilian" in that shot!  ;)
Title: Re: On the Rocks
Post by: cjogo on June 25, 2013, 12:33:42 pm
There nothing "Brazilian" in that shot!  ;)


No waxing here ... especially up in the Santa Cruz Mountains in the 80's
Title: Re: On the Rocks
Post by: cjogo on June 25, 2013, 12:37:34 pm
About 15 years later --- 100 miles South 
Title: Re: On the Rocks
Post by: Rob C on June 25, 2013, 03:17:29 pm
About 15 years later --- 100 miles South 


Are you sure? Neither model nor merkin have aged a bit!

Weren't you afraid of snakes?

;-)

Rob C
Title: Re: On the Rocks
Post by: WalterEG on June 25, 2013, 04:31:42 pm
Weren't you afraid of snakes?

Perhaps the model was a tad wary of trouser snakes.

What a total joy to return to the days of artistic shrubbery!  In short supply these days.

W
Title: Re: On the Rocks
Post by: cjogo on June 25, 2013, 04:35:33 pm
She was a snake in the grass  ;D   -- The original was about 1985/86 Coastal Mountains above Davenport , CA... The last one was takin' about 1994 --Big Sur Mountains
Title: Re: On the Rocks
Post by: Rob C on June 25, 2013, 04:59:44 pm
Perhaps the model was a tad wary of trouser snakes.

What a total joy to return to the days of artistic shrubbery!  In short supply these days.

W


I'm all for a bit of gardening myself, Walter, just as long as it's done in the best possible taste. I'm not into a scorched earth policy.

But that's a British obsession: we all like straight edges to our lawns, which amazes the local gardeners here in Mallorca, who simply mow around any obstruction. There are some amazing sights.

Rob C
Title: Re: On the Rocks
Post by: RFPhotography on June 25, 2013, 09:24:58 pm
It's the porn factor.  Clean and smooth is all the rage.  Even men are doing it.  If you're in pursuit of hirsute you may have to be looking for more mature subjects.
Title: Re: On the Rocks
Post by: David Eckels on June 26, 2013, 06:39:09 pm
Can't resist, sorry. Can you clone that bush out. I find it distracting. ;D
Title: Re: On the Rocks
Post by: cjogo on June 26, 2013, 07:50:16 pm
Can't resist, sorry. Can you clone that bush out. I find it distracting. ;D

I could had a little under the arms , though  ;D