Luminous Landscape Forum
Raw & Post Processing, Printing => Colour Management => Topic started by: MelHill on August 26, 2010, 04:03:13 pm
-
(http://melhill.com/custom_cal.jpg)
pretty big swings between the two calibrators
and this is from the same file...
the only difference between the to images is the applied calibration
-
I'm not really surprised, I've seen similar differences. FWIW, I slightly prefer the X-Rite profile for my 5DMII.
-
So far, All I've looked at are portraits and I do prefer the xrite version so far.
-
I'm not really surprised, I've seen similar differences. FWIW, I slightly prefer the X-Rite profile for my 5DMII.
same exact here
-
Yes, I've noticed the same thing, and I, like those above, prefer the Xrite profiles. The interesting thing is, if you open the resulting profiles in a text editor, the Adobe profiles are much, much longer and more complicated. They apparently have more color matrices and more levels. The Xrite profiles are only a dozen or so lines long. I'd love to know what the differences are. But it appears to me that more complicated may not be better.
-
Profile software optimize profiles for different characteristics. So given a single set of measurements, it's possible to build a large number of different profiles, with different visual behavior. You can think of them as different flavors based on the same initial measurement data.
-
I'm shooting a couple of D700s and more often than not I prefer the Adobe profiles. I've found the X-Rite profiles often have a green cast but I haven't played with the software since December so perhaps they've made some tweaks.
Cheers, Joe
-
I have settled on the Adobe over the X-Rite. When I started using the CCP with the X-Rite software, I was having difficulty with printed images looking like the original artwork I was imaging.
A colleague of mine had suggested the Adobe DNG profile editor. At first, reluctant to use the Adobe DNG profile editor, I became frustrated using the X-Rite software. (One more step was added with the Adobe DNG profile editor.) However when I gave DNG profile editor a try, I was getting the results I had been looking for.
For my work flow, I stick with the Adobe DNG profile editor.
Hope this is some help.
Cheers
David