Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: Justan on July 10, 2010, 11:00:30 am
-
This is a composite of 23 frames and the 2.3 GB .tif file was created (stitched) by the use of the mah-velous PTGUI stitcher.
(http://www.justan-elk.com/Images/Cityscapes/Small-NorthMarinaSunsetPan-2.jpg)
-
It appears to be quite interesting, but it is impossible to tell at such a small size.
-
I agree with SB.
-
The width of the original is about 26K pixels where the reduction above is a single K pixel wide. What would be tolerable minimal suitable size for this?
-
... What would be tolerable minimal suitable size for this?
Maybe something like 400-600 pixels tall?
-
Here are a couple of larger examples
(http://www.justan-elk.com/images/oversize/NorthMarinaSunsetPan-2.jpg)
This is a different crop, and was shot a little later
(http://www.justan-elk.com/images/oversize/MarinaSunsetImages2.jpg)
-
This is a composite of 23 frames and the 2.3 GB .tif file was created (stitched) by the use of the mah-velous PTGUI stitcher.
(http://www.justan-elk.com/Images/Cityscapes/Small-NorthMarinaSunsetPan-2.jpg)
Pleasant colors, but to be frank, I believe that it is too wide.
Such panos need to have some outstanding element somewhere along the x axis to work. Here we just have a collection of masts with no particular reason to start or stop at a given place.
So good technical job I assume (again too small to judge) but can probably be improved composition wise.
Cheers,
Bernard
-
Thanks for the feedback.
-
This image would have been nicer if it has the point of interest that it lacks.. It feels like repetition of sail poles everywhere..
Cheers.
-
This is the sort of image that might work if I saw it really really large. But at this size it is Toothpicks at sunset.
-
It lacks a focal point.