Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => The Coffee Corner => Topic started by: fredjeang on February 01, 2010, 02:43:00 pm

Title: The female presence ??
Post by: fredjeang on February 01, 2010, 02:43:00 pm
Hi,

I joined the LU-LA about ten days ago, and noticed so far that there
are no women in the forum  

Curious no?

Women are now
plane pilots,
submarine officers,
truck drivers,
ship captains,
space-shuttle astonauts,
etc...

photography????  


Fred.

Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Jonathan Wienke on February 01, 2010, 02:48:44 pm
They're a minority, but not because there are any "no women allowed" rules here. But they are around and do post if you look.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: DarkPenguin on February 01, 2010, 03:11:13 pm
I dunno.  I think we drove off the last female forumite ....
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: JeffKohn on February 01, 2010, 05:20:48 pm
It seems the more gear-driven and tech-focused a forum is, the fewer female participants it will have.  I also think the "Landscape" focus of this site makes it less popular with women. I know LuLua isn't just about landscape but it is the dominant genre (the MFDB forum being the main exception to that).

Other forums I've frequented that had a broader focus on photography of all types (and not so much on camera equipment) seem to have more female participation.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Lisa Nikodym on February 01, 2010, 05:50:40 pm
Quote
I dunno. I think we drove off the last female forumite ....

Hey, I'm still here...  I'm not quite as vocal as I once was, as things have been gradually drifting away towards things I'm less interested in (medium format, color management, "everybody look at my picture" posts, verbal pissing contests, etc. etc.), but I still show up now & then (mostly to give travel advice, it seems  ).

I only participate in one other photography forum, and it seems to have a slightly higher density of females, but only slightly, and they seem to concentrate in the "smaller camera" (4/3, digicam, small Leica) categories, while the cameras of most interest at the LL forum seem to be getting bigger, heavier and more expensive as time goes on.  I'm going in the other direction, trying out downsizing from a full-size DSLR to a micro 4/3 just because it's easier to carry for long periods of time for those of us with smaller hands and weaker shoulders.

Lisa
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on February 01, 2010, 09:55:38 pm
I'm glad you're still with us, Lisa. Your contributions are always valuable.

Eric

Title: The female presence ??
Post by: stamper on February 02, 2010, 04:14:57 am
Quote from: fredjeang
Hi,

I joined the LU-LA about ten days ago, and noticed so far that there
are no women in the forum  

Curious no?

Women are now
plane pilots,
submarine officers,
truck drivers,
ship captains,
space-shuttle astonauts,
etc...

photography????  


Fred.

What about transvestites and gays?
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Rob C on February 02, 2010, 05:15:01 am
Quote from: stamper
What about transvestites and gays?




Ah Stamper, therein lies the conundrum: do females accept these categories more readily than do males? And if so why so, and if not, why not?

I think it would be much more interesting were women given to posting more often; I have usually found the real-life situation of speaking with the ladies to be generally more rewarding than much of the conversation with male persons. With the latter, it tends to be always the same: they are doing fantastically well, even as their shoes disintegrate; everything sems to have to be presented in the most positive manner, spin being king regardless of what the reality might be. I have learned through experience that women are generally far more realistic. Of course, that's the major reason why they are feared in some - ermm - societies: they would make far better leaders if only because they are able to look at life without testosterone delusions and seem able to take unpopular decisions if they deem them to be the correct ones. One has to look no further than the UK's Margaret Thatcher: the best prime minister in decades, she was brought down by the egos and envy of her own male politicians.  Clever boys.

I can't think of a single incident on LuLa where a woman has caused a thread to be shut down.

Rob C
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: ErikKaffehr on February 02, 2010, 06:58:45 am
Hi,

There are and used to be a few female posters, and also they tend to be on the positive side. I recall Jessica Luchesi, Eleanor Brown, Token Girl, Lisa Nikodym and a few a more. More female posters would be nice, of course.

Best regards
Erik

Quote from: fredjeang
Hi,

I joined the LU-LA about ten days ago, and noticed so far that there
are no women in the forum  

Curious no?

Women are now
plane pilots,
submarine officers,
truck drivers,
ship captains,
space-shuttle astonauts,
etc...

photography????  


Fred.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: ErikKaffehr on February 02, 2010, 07:05:59 am
Hi,

I second that. On the other hand most posters on the forum are good regardless of sex.

Regarding female leaders I'd suggest they need to be good, because they cannot compete with males on mediocrity. Angela Merkel seem also be a pretty good leader.

Best regards
Erik

Quote from: Rob C
Ah Stamper, therein lies the conundrum: do females accept these categories more readily than do males? And if so why so, and if not, why not?

I think it would be much more interesting were women given to posting more often; I have usually found the real-life situation of speaking with the ladies to be generally more rewarding than much of the conversation with male persons. With the latter, it tends to be always the same: they are doing fantastically well, even as their shoes disintegrate; everything sems to have to be presented in the most positive manner, spin being king regardless of what the reality might be. I have learned through experience that women are generally far more realistic. Of course, that's the major reason why they are feared in some - ermm - societies: they would make far better leaders if only because they are able to look at life without testosterone delusions and seem able to take unpopular decisions if they deem them to be the correct ones. One has to look no further than the UK's Margaret Thatcher: the best prime minister in decades, she was brought down by the egos and envy of her own male politicians.  Clever boys.

I can't think of a single incident on LuLa where a woman has caused a thread to be shut down.

Rob C
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: tokengirl on February 02, 2010, 07:12:27 am
Quote from: fredjeang
Hi,

I joined the LU-LA about ten days ago, and noticed so far that there
are no women in the forum  


You're hurting my feelings.  
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: stamper on February 02, 2010, 08:14:52 am
Quote from: Rob C
Ah Stamper, therein lies the conundrum: do females accept these categories more readily than do males? And if so why so, and if not, why not?

I think it would be much more interesting were women given to posting more often; I have usually found the real-life situation of speaking with the ladies to be generally more rewarding than much of the conversation with male persons. With the latter, it tends to be always the same: they are doing fantastically well, even as their shoes disintegrate; everything sems to have to be presented in the most positive manner, spin being king regardless of what the reality might be. I have learned through experience that women are generally far more realistic. Of course, that's the major reason why they are feared in some - ermm - societies: they would make far better leaders if only because they are able to look at life without testosterone delusions and seem able to take unpopular decisions if they deem them to be the correct ones. One has to look no further than the UK's Margaret Thatcher: the best prime minister in decades, she was brought down by the egos and envy of her own male politicians.  Clever boys.

I can't think of a single incident on LuLa where a woman has caused a thread to be shut down.

Rob C

I was enjoying your postings to the forum until you mentioned Margaret Thatcher.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Lisa Nikodym on February 02, 2010, 12:29:00 pm
Quote
I'm glad you're still with us, Lisa. Your contributions are always valuable.

Eric

Awww, thanks Eric.
Are you the same Eric who likes my mountain photos?  If so, then I have to apologize - I have a great set of photos from my vacation to the Dolomites (northern Italy; fantastic mountains!) last July, but have been so busy this past year that I haven't quite gotten around to finishing them, so they aren't up on the web site yet.  I *hope* to finish them in the next few weeks.  In between trying to figure out how to properly use my new GH1...

Lisa
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Wolfman on February 02, 2010, 01:57:56 pm
Quote from: Lisa Nikodym
Awww, thanks Eric.
Are you the same Eric who likes my mountain photos?  If so, then I have to apologize - I have a great set of photos from my vacation to the Dolomites (northern Italy; fantastic mountains!) last July, but have been so busy this past year that I haven't quite gotten around to finishing them, so they aren't up on the web site yet.  I *hope* to finish them in the next few weeks.  In between trying to figure out how to properly use my new GH1...

Lisa


Lisa.... that would be great to see your Dolomite images when they are ready....... I shot that area about 4 years ago..... it's fantastic.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: PeterAit on February 02, 2010, 02:02:12 pm
Quote from: JeffKohn
It seems the more gear-driven and tech-focused a forum is, the fewer female participants it will have.  I also think the "Landscape" focus of this site makes it less popular with women. I know LuLua isn't just about landscape but it is the dominant genre (the MFDB forum being the main exception to that).

Other forums I've frequented that had a broader focus on photography of all types (and not so much on camera equipment) seem to have more female participation.

Could you recommend a couple of forums that focus on other areas of photography? Thanks.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Paul Sumi on February 02, 2010, 03:04:11 pm
Quote from: PeterAit
Could you recommend a couple of forums that focus on other areas of photography? Thanks.

Sportsshooter.com for sports and photojournalism (but need to be recommended by current member and fill out application to join to be able to post on forum).

FredMiranda.com has a number of specific interest photo forums (landscape, sports, wedding, general professional, B&W, etc).  Also a number of forums dedicated to photo equipment.

nwpphotoforum.com for nature, wildlife and pet photography

Paul
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Rob C on February 02, 2010, 03:40:45 pm
Quote from: stamper
I was enjoying your postings to the forum until you mentioned Margaret Thatcher.




No problem: draw a discreet blue veil around the subject!

;-)

Rob C
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on February 02, 2010, 05:10:53 pm
Quote from: ErikKaffehr
... More female posters would be nice, of course...
With the goal of a "fair and balanced" membership, may I suggest to the moderators to freeze any new male membership applications until a 50/50 split is reached?
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on February 02, 2010, 05:47:38 pm
Quote from: Lisa Nikodym
Awww, thanks Eric.
Are you the same Eric who likes my mountain photos?  If so, then I have to apologize - I have a great set of photos from my vacation to the Dolomites (northern Italy; fantastic mountains!) last July, but have been so busy this past year that I haven't quite gotten around to finishing them, so they aren't up on the web site yet.  I *hope* to finish them in the next few weeks.  In between trying to figure out how to properly use my new GH1...

Lisa
Yes, Lisa, I love your mountain pix. Do let us all know when you have the Dolomites up on the web site.

Eric


Title: The female presence ??
Post by: blansky on February 02, 2010, 07:11:48 pm
I think that pretty much everyone can attest to the fact that women are far too emotional for these types of forums. Added to that their total inability to handle mechanical type devices as well as computers and it just adds up to an unmitigated disaster.

They obviously are much better suited to the cooking, homemaking and perhaps sewing sections of the world wide web.











I'm joking.......... boy, some people are so sensitive.


Michael
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on February 02, 2010, 07:37:21 pm
Quote from: blansky
I think that pretty much everyone can attest to the fact that women are far too emotional for these types of forums. Added to that their total inability to handle mechanical type devices as well as computers and it just adds up to an unmitigated disaster.

They obviously are much better suited to the cooking, homemaking and perhaps sewing sections of the world wide web.


I'm joking.......... boy, some people are so sensitive.


Michael

Translation: Men aren't encumbered by a right brain, while women are? 
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Lisa Nikodym on February 02, 2010, 11:08:07 pm
Quote
Yes, Lisa, I love your mountain pix. Do let us all know when you have the Dolomites up on the web site.

Eric

Quote
Lisa.... that would be great to see your Dolomite images when they are ready....... I shot that area about 4 years ago..... it's fantastic.

OK, OK, I'll post a note here (well, in the Locations subforum) when they're done and posted...I'll try to finish them in the next week or two.  It's good to know that somebody is enjoying them...  

Lisa
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Ray on February 02, 2010, 11:08:30 pm
Quote from: Rob C
One has to look no further than the UK's Margaret Thatcher: the best prime minister in decades, she was brought down by the egos and envy of her own male politicians.  Clever boys.

Tell me, Rob. Wasn't Margaret Thatcher the lady who had a big fight with the coal miners in the U.K, then handed out lots of money to groups of climatologists to find evidence that our CO2 emissions are warming the planet, thus creating a big scare and making the building of Nuclear Power stations more acceptable to the public?
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: stamper on February 03, 2010, 09:48:31 am
I was enjoying your postings to the forum until you mentioned Margaret Thatcher.

Quote from: Rob C
No problem: draw a discreet blue veil around the subject!

;-)

Rob C

Thank you. That would lift the red mist
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: ErikKaffehr on February 03, 2010, 12:59:59 pm
Lisa,

The Eric you may have in thought may spell his name with "k" like Erik ;-)

I hope you enjoyed your trip to the Dolomites.

Much interested in your experience on the GH1, by the way. :-)

Best regards
Erik


Quote from: Lisa Nikodym
Awww, thanks Eric.
Are you the same Eric who likes my mountain photos?  If so, then I have to apologize - I have a great set of photos from my vacation to the Dolomites (northern Italy; fantastic mountains!) last July, but have been so busy this past year that I haven't quite gotten around to finishing them, so they aren't up on the web site yet.  I *hope* to finish them in the next few weeks.  In between trying to figure out how to properly use my new GH1...

Lisa
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Lisa Nikodym on February 03, 2010, 05:00:08 pm
Quote
Lisa,

The Eric you may have in thought may spell his name with "k" like Erik ;-)

I hope you enjoyed your trip to the Dolomites.

Much interested in your experience on the GH1, by the way. :-)

Best regards
Erik

Hi Erik (with a "k")!
Actually, it was the Eric with a "c" that I was thinking of, but I remember admiring *your* photos of the Dolomites before my trip (and thank you for your recommendations).  They are really stunning mountains.  We are thinking about going back later this year to see some different parts of them.  I'll try to get some of my photos of them up on my web site this weekend.

I'm still trying to figure out all the features on the GH1, and how best to do things with it.  Initial tests of the image quality with the 14-140mm lens show that it's *almost* as good as my Nikon D300 with the Nikon 18-200 VR lens.  It's much smaller and lighter than my Nikon kit, and the ergonomics seem quite good; it doesn't take long to get the hang of most of the controls.  There are just so many options and features (for example: not just face recognition, but you can train it to recognize specific peoples' faces to focus on!) that it's taking quite awhile to sort through them all and make sure all the settings are optimal for my shooting style.  I'll try to remember to send you a PM when I've tried it out enough to decide which camera I like better (but if you haven't heard from me in about a month, you can send me a PM to remind me).

Lisa
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: eleanorbrown on February 03, 2010, 05:19:56 pm
Hi Eric and yes, I'm still around!  do like medium format and landscapes and shoot other things too!  I recently returned from Bosque del Apache in New Mexico and posted some landscapes of that place on my site.  Geezzz, what an incredibly gorgeous place with a preponderance of reds and yellows (very "winter like")!  Eleanor

Quote from: ErikKaffehr
Hi,

There are and used to be a few female posters, and also they tend to be on the positive side. I recall Jessica Luchesi, Eleanor Brown, Token Girl, Lisa Nikodym and a few a more. More female posters would be nice, of course.

Best regards
Erik
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Paul Sumi on February 03, 2010, 05:41:29 pm
Quote from: eleanorbrown
I recently returned from Bosque del Apache in New Mexico and posted some landscapes of that place on my site.  Geezzz, what an incredibly gorgeous place with a preponderance of reds and yellows (very "winter like")!  Eleanor

Eleanor, your Bosque landscapes are quite a departure from the usual migrating waterfowl images we see this time of year.  It's great to see this other side of the Apache Woods.

Paul
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Rob C on February 03, 2010, 06:38:21 pm
Quote from: Ray
Tell me, Rob. Wasn't Margaret Thatcher the lady who had a big fight with the coal miners in the U.K, then handed out lots of money to groups of climatologists to find evidence that our CO2 emissions are warming the planet, thus creating a big scare and making the building of Nuclear Power stations more acceptable to the public?




She was the lady who did away with the dollar premium and made it possible for poor guys like me to move abroad and buy a place to live...

The greatest politicians I remember were Harold Wilson and Jim Callaghan. Why did they make such an indelible mark on me?  Because during their reign, at the time I was starting my calendar business, I found myself ending every quotation with the immortal and encouraging words: "final price dependent on rate of inflation at time of delivery." You can just imagine how welcome that was on a production that was starting off life at around forty to fifty grand and with delivery time around ten months away from placing of the order...

Yep, she did have a scrap with the coal boys and won. Just as she did with that lot down in the upside-down half of the world when they tried to free some islands that didn't want freedom... sounds spookily current, don't you think?

But let's not get bogged down in politicians: they all do more harm than good - check your local airport!

;-)

Rob C
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: eleanorbrown on February 03, 2010, 07:25:40 pm
Paul it was interesting...my reaction to Bosque.  For the most part all I'd ever seen was images of thousands of geese taking off etc etc....wonderful images for sure but I was immediately taken by the landscape itself.  I was not prepared for the incredible beauty of the place..the color was incredible, at least with the light and weather I had to work with---sunset one evening and clouds and drizzle next morning.  I used one camera with one wide angle lens and everything, and I mean everything in this series was handheld. Eleanor

Quote from: Paul Sumi
Eleanor, your Bosque landscapes are quite a departure from the usual migrating waterfowl images we see this time of year.  It's great to see this other side of the Apache Woods.

Paul
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on February 04, 2010, 12:28:39 am
Quote from: eleanorbrown
Paul it was interesting...my reaction to Bosque.  For the most part all I'd ever seen was images of thousands of geese taking off etc etc....wonderful images for sure but I was immediately taken by the landscape itself.  I was not prepared for the incredible beauty of the place..the color was incredible, at least with the light and weather I had to work with---sunset one evening and clouds and drizzle next morning.  I used one camera with one wide angle lens and everything, and I mean everything in this series was handheld. Eleanor
Eleanor,

My own reaction to Bosque on my one visit about two years ago was very similar. We saw birds, but I was most impressed by the magical sense of light of the place. I'll check out your new images tomorrow.


Eric (one of the "c" Eric's, not the "k" one)




Title: The female presence ??
Post by: LoisWakeman on February 04, 2010, 04:39:49 am
I may look like an old boot and be occasionally addressed as 'sir', but I am definitely female

However, I do tend to stay away from the "my lens is bigger than your lens" type threads, and keep out of the occasional mud-slinging that goes on here. I am far more interested in composition and the emotional and artistic aspects of photography than the technical side. (Not because I am a hopeless girly - I am reasonably technically literate, having a science degree - but because I think the results have to speak for themselves, rather than the kit that was used to get them.)

Oh, and I love landscapes best of all, and was surprised to read that women are generally less interested in that genre.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: fredjeang on February 04, 2010, 05:26:52 am
Quote from: LoisWakeman
I may look like an old boot and be occasionally addressed as 'sir', but I am definitely female

However, I do tend to stay away from the "my lens is bigger than your lens" type threads, and keep out of the occasional mud-slinging that goes on here. I am far more interested in composition and the emotional and artistic aspects of photography than the technical side. (Not because I am a hopeless girly - I am reasonably technically literate, having a science degree - but because I think the results have to speak for themselves, rather than the kit that was used to get them.)

Oh, and I love landscapes best of all, and was surprised to read that women are generally less interested in that genre.
Hi Lois,
I was looking at your website and was VERY happy to see how just right is the usability, navigation and searching. Apart from the pure design, (because it is something strictly personal), your website is an example for "how-to-do-things-just-right" (sorry for my bad english).
I enjoyed a lot, a pleasure.

Fred.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: LoisWakeman on February 05, 2010, 06:19:59 am
Thanks for your kind words Fred - and your English is fine.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: jjj on February 05, 2010, 09:04:15 am
Quote from: Rob C
Of course, that's the major reason why women are feared in some - ermm - societies: they would make far better leaders if only because they are able to look at life without testosterone delusions and seem able to take unpopular decisions if they deem them to be the correct ones. One has to look no further than the UK's Margaret Thatcher: the best prime minister in decades, she was brought down by the egos and envy of her own male politicians.  Clever boys.
Thatcher was far more macho and aggressive than most men. "The Lady is not for turning" was a honest statement of her inflexibility and unwillingness to admitting to mistakes. Blair learnt a lot from her!
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: bjanes on February 05, 2010, 11:20:34 am
Quote from: blansky
I think that pretty much everyone can attest to the fact that women are far too emotional for these types of forums. Added to that their total inability to handle mechanical type devices as well as computers and it just adds up to an unmitigated disaster.

They obviously are much better suited to the cooking, homemaking and perhaps sewing sections of the world wide web.
I'm joking.......... boy, some people are so sensitive.
Michael
As Larry Summers learned, politically incorrect statements concerning the innate abilities of females on math and science can get one in trouble. I suspect that many women are more interested in artistic results than theory and gear, but the two are not incompatible as posts by Marianne Oelund (http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=34329917) show.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Rob C on February 06, 2010, 05:25:30 pm
Quote from: jjj
Thatcher was far more macho and aggressive than most men. "The Lady is not for turning" was a honest statement of her inflexibility and unwillingness to admitting to mistakes. Blair learnt a lot from her!




Nice to see you posting again; Blair's problem was that all the real battles had already been fought so he had to involve himself in others which were really outwith his field of genuine concern. Remember, he was the one obsessed by 'legacy' which, it seems, has escaped him, leaving not even a ripple in his wake. Regarding Maggie - I always did say she was the best man we ever had. Mistakes? In politics, mistakes are only mistakes when events turn them into mistakes. At the onset, they have a fifty-fifty chance at worst of being the right thing to do. Had Blair picked on an 'adventure' that really concerned the UK's interests in a basic and visceral manner, he might have still been in office today instead of just making more money and pissing around in the middle-east.

Slightly off-topic, I find it quite astonishing that the gutter press has been able to dethrone John Terry, put England's chances into even greater jeopardy, and otherwise turn private peccadillos into public concerns. A classical case of public interest being confused with public curiosity. By the way, I don't watch football, thinking all these people should have left that stuff behind them in school. There is something slightly bizarre about adults playing childhood games, the only thing even further out being that they can become extremely rich doing so. Strange world.

;-)

Rob C
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: ErikKaffehr on February 07, 2010, 01:27:24 am
Hi,

I presume it's just statistics, but I got the impression that the few female posters on the forum are both well informed, technically competent and not least polite. A few male posters are ignorant and rude. Majority of posters are serious, knowledgeable and helpful.

Best regards
Erik


Quote from: bjanes
As Larry Summers learned, politically incorrect statements concerning the innate abilities of females on math and science can get one in trouble. I suspect that many women are more interested in artistic results than theory and gear, but the two are not incompatible as posts by Marianne Oelund (http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=34329917) show.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: ErikKaffehr on February 07, 2010, 01:28:19 am
Hi,

I presume it's just statistics, but I got the impression that the few female posters on the forum are both well informed, technically competent and not least polite. A few male posters are ignorant and rude. Majority of posters are serious, knowledgeable and helpful.

Best regards
Erik


Quote from: bjanes
As Larry Summers learned, politically incorrect statements concerning the innate abilities of females on math and science can get one in trouble. I suspect that many women are more interested in artistic results than theory and gear, but the two are not incompatible as posts by Marianne Oelund (http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=34329917) show.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Lisa Nikodym on February 08, 2010, 11:00:23 pm
Eric & Wolfman, I've just posted my Dolomites photos in a new thread under the "Landscape Photography Locations" forum.  I'm pretty sure this trip counts as "most keepers per day" of any trip I've made!

Lisa
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on February 08, 2010, 11:27:18 pm
Quote from: Lisa Nikodym
Eric & Wolfman, I've just posted my Dolomites photos in a new thread under the "Landscape Photography Locations" forum.  I'm pretty sure this trip counts as "most keepers per day" of any trip I've made!

Lisa

Great! I'm out of town for a few days and the computer I'm at right now is not color calibrated, so I'm going to wait until I get home.

Eric
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Theresa on March 04, 2010, 04:54:08 pm
Quote from: ErikKaffehr
Hi,

I presume it's just statistics, but I got the impression that the few female posters on the forum are both well informed, technically competent and not least polite. A few male posters are ignorant and rude. Majority of posters are serious, knowledgeable and helpful.

Best regards
Erik

I am a woman and what I find oppressive is the gay baiting.  Those that do it show their ignorance by not even getting the vocabulary right.  The world is full of ignorant conservatives who believe that anyone who doesn't fit into their limited world view should be silenced.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: ErikKaffehr on March 04, 2010, 11:49:05 pm
Hi,

Sorry, it may be my english, but I don't get your point.

Anyway, what I mean is that the few female posters used to post good questions or good info. There are a few posters who are far less positive (in my view) and they used to be male.

Best regards
Erik


Quote from: Theresa
I am a woman and what I find oppressive is the gay baiting.  Those that do it show their ignorance by not even getting the vocabulary right.  The world is full of ignorant conservatives who believe that anyone who doesn't fit into their limited world view should be silenced.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Jeremy Roussak on March 05, 2010, 03:44:39 am
Quote from: Theresa
I am a woman and what I find oppressive is the gay baiting.  Those that do it show their ignorance by not even getting the vocabulary right.  The world is full of ignorant conservatives who believe that anyone who doesn't fit into their limited world view should be silenced.
What on earth are you talking about?

Jeremy
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: LoisWakeman on March 05, 2010, 04:10:21 am
Quote from: Theresa
what I find oppressive is the gay baiting
Pardon? I've been a fairly regular visitor here for years and haven't noticed any. Have you got LuLa mixed up with another forum perhaps?
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: RSL on March 05, 2010, 09:57:04 am
Quote from: Theresa
I am a woman and what I find oppressive is the gay baiting.  Those that do it show their ignorance by not even getting the vocabulary right.  The world is full of ignorant conservatives who believe that anyone who doesn't fit into their limited world view should be silenced.

Theresa, Is that because you're gay?
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: ckimmerle on March 05, 2010, 10:05:11 am
Quote from: RSL
Theresa, Is that because you're gay?

Not sure that's relevant as I, a straight fella, feel basically the same way. That said, her post was a bit harsh and out of the blue. Perhaps, as someone has suggested, Theresa meant to post this elsewhere. It's something I've done once or twice.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: RSL on March 05, 2010, 01:15:56 pm
Chuck, I think it was a pertinent question. The point is, the lady's (I use the term advisedly) blast doesn't belong here. Here is where we talk about photography -- not politics.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Rob C on March 05, 2010, 04:18:51 pm
I haven't noticed any gay-bashing here yet; however, I do dislike the gratuitous hijacking of what used to be a very comfortable English word which was once even part and parcel of the name of a famous regiment. Couldn't they just use the technical name and leave the rest of the world in peace? Perhaps the need was felt to use a euphemism, but surely a free one could have been invented?

Rob C
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: eleanorbrown on March 05, 2010, 05:24:47 pm
Ditto.  Same here. eleanor

Quote from: LoisWakeman
Pardon? I've been a fairly regular visitor here for years and haven't noticed any.
Title: The female presence ??
Post by: RSL on March 05, 2010, 06:16:04 pm
Quote from: Rob C
I haven't noticed any gay-bashing here yet; however, I do dislike the gratuitous hijacking of what used to be a very comfortable English word which was once even part and parcel of the name of a famous regiment. Couldn't they just use the technical name and leave the rest of the world in peace? Perhaps the need was felt to use a euphemism, but surely a free one could have been invented?

Rob C

Rob, Think that's bad? Try the once beautiful word, "fairy," or the once useful word "fagot," or the word my mother used to use all the time, "queer." I could go on, but I don't want to break down and cry. I love the English language and I hate to see it trashed. It's been trashed.

Title: The female presence ??
Post by: Christopher Sanderson on March 06, 2010, 10:11:41 am
I believe that after a month, this thread could now easily degenerate into silliness or worse. Time to move on before it goes really sour.
Topic Closed.