Luminous Landscape Forum
Raw & Post Processing, Printing => Adobe Lightroom Q&A => Topic started by: simplify on January 25, 2010, 07:02:46 pm
-
Does anybody know when the full version might be released, Q1? Q2? Q3? Q4? 2011?
-
The current Lightroom 3 public beta will expire on April 30, 2010
The delivered product will probably be some time around the same time frame.
I had to quit playing with it, it was too hard to keep going back to 2.6. The new sharpening is so good that my 2.6 images pale in comparison, which I used to think were just fine...
-
The only people who truly know are not in a position to say, at the moment. The most that can be said is simply that it will ship when it is ready.
-
The most that can be said is simply that it will ship when it is ready.
That's a wonderful quote, Eric! The Microsoft version should probably go like this: "The most that can be said is simply that it will ship when it is almost ready."
Eric M.
-
Yup, I like that quote too, Eric. Those who know can't say, and those who say, don't know.
Mike.
-
Remember that any non trivial software only exists in two states - just started and nearly finished
keith
-
The only people who truly know are not in a position to say, at the moment. The most that can be said is simply that it will ship when it is ready.
Any chance there will be a patch to the beta prior to the official release?
As expected, there are tons of bugs ... but I think I could use it full-time with one good patch.
Most of my issues relate to dates.
-
I'm quite happy with 2.6 until 3.0 is ready.
Really ready.
With soft-proofing.
-
I'm quite happy with 2.6 until 3.0 is ready.
Really ready.
…
Me too! I'd rather wait six more months rather than getting buggy/unfinished software. So far, 2.6 has been very stable and although I'd like to have softproofing and other goodies, LR 2.6 has never been a bottleneck in my workflow.
-
Understood. The LR team is rather serious about getting the kinks worked out, too. The reliability/consistency aspect of it is not being taken lightly.
-
I suggest we get Schewe to do hits Orson Wells imitation of “we will sell no wine (I mean software) before its time“.
Jeff’s got a better shirt collection.
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.you...cZibQbzvCDnMZvA (http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DvaEeAcH0lFU&ei=ykFfS-fzCpD8tAP-9Ji7Cw&sa=X&oi=video_result&resnum=2&ct=thumbnail&ved=0CA4QuAIwAQ&usg=AFQjCNENVUg36td2HCzcZibQbzvCDnMZvA)
-
I suggest we get Schewe to do hits Orson Wells imitation of “we will sell no wine (I mean software) before its time“.
Jeff’s got a better shirt collection.
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.you...cZibQbzvCDnMZvA (http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DvaEeAcH0lFU&ei=ykFfS-fzCpD8tAP-9Ji7Cw&sa=X&oi=video_result&resnum=2&ct=thumbnail&ved=0CA4QuAIwAQ&usg=AFQjCNENVUg36td2HCzcZibQbzvCDnMZvA)
I'm pretty sure that Jeff drinks Paul Mason wine too!
-
Just a reminder: Adobe Feature Request and Bug Report Submission Form (https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform)
Mike.
-
I'm pretty sure that Jeff drinks Paul Mason wine too!
Naw, that stuff is ratpiss (to borrow a term from Greg Gorman).
-
Naw, that stuff is ratpiss (to borrow a term from Greg Gorman).
Orson Welles couldn't drink it either, at least according to wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Masson). (Phew! Reassuring to know he hadn't such a bad taste, in a way)
-
Hi Eric,
Let the LR 3, please run on OS 10.4.11 as well. thanks!
-
Let the LR 3, please run on OS 10.4.11 as well. thanks!
Ain't gonna happen, bud..
Leopard (10.5.8) and MacIntel will be the minimum Mac/OS X requirements for LR 3.
Seriously, get used to the fact that applications will need to adopt current (recent) system API's and hardware specs.
Tiger is simply too old to even be considered to be supported.