Luminous Landscape Forum

Equipment & Techniques => Landscape & Nature Photography => Topic started by: JanStankewitzHunt on December 09, 2009, 04:28:22 pm

Title: Pictures from Hoosierland Indiana
Post by: JanStankewitzHunt on December 09, 2009, 04:28:22 pm
I'm new so some comments would be appreciated. Thanks
Title: Pictures from Hoosierland Indiana
Post by: JanStankewitzHunt on December 10, 2009, 08:49:42 pm
Quote from: pearlstreet
The last is very pretty. Nice colors and composition. I don't like the vignetting on any of these. I find that it detracts from the photos.

Sharon

Wow, that is kinda my signature and something that I do to all my photos to frame them and give ma a place to put my signature. Maybe I will try something else for a while.
Title: Pictures from Hoosierland Indiana
Post by: wolfnowl on December 10, 2009, 09:33:06 pm
Hi Jan:  Welcome to the list!  I'm with Sharon here.  The last one is pretty good, but I'd do w/o the vignette.  Once in a while it can be well used, but overused it becomes shtick.  Like the fairy in the third one too.

Mike.
Title: Pictures from Hoosierland Indiana
Post by: DanSvoboda on December 16, 2009, 11:53:43 am
Quote from: JanStankewitzHunt
I'm new so some comments would be appreciated. Thanks

I think the first 3 are very static and not well composed. There is little to keep my interest. None of them is sharp. The 4th scene does have a potential as strong colours go along way. I'd suggest you stay away from controversial framing. Your work should be recognizable on merits not on on gimmicks. Hope I am not being too hard. Keep it up. It takes time and hard work. Daniel :-)
Title: Pictures from Hoosierland Indiana
Post by: JanStankewitzHunt on December 16, 2009, 03:39:59 pm
Quote from: DanSvoboda
I think the first 3 are very static and not well composed.


I'm confused on the not well composed part. I think that they follow the rule of three very well. Did I miss something?
Title: Pictures from Hoosierland Indiana
Post by: tgipson on December 16, 2009, 06:17:56 pm
Quote from: JanStankewitzHunt
I'm confused on the not well composed part. I think that they follow the rule of three very well. Did I miss something?

I have to agree that the first three have a lower dynamic range and not much movement, i.e. a bit too static. The fourth one has a good color range and better contrast in textures. I have to think too hard about the three's in the first few.