Luminous Landscape Forum

Equipment & Techniques => Digital Cameras & Shooting Techniques => Topic started by: on April 07, 2003, 08:51:14 am

Title: Pro 14n Evaluation by an Owner
Post by: on April 07, 2003, 08:51:14 am

Some people say that the Emperor's clothes are actually quite lovely.

Others appear to be on the Emperor's staff.  ???

Michael

Title: Pro 14n Evaluation by an Owner
Post by: Jonathan Wienke on April 09, 2003, 02:21:12 am

I noticed all the guys in the forum you mentioned are studio photographers shooting at ISO 80, no mention of ISO 400 or 800 testing.

Title: Pro 14n Evaluation by an Owner
Post by: Peter K. Burian on April 06, 2003, 10:07:21 pm

Seeral photographers have purchased Pro 14n bodies. You'll find some comments (from at least one owner) as to the camera and its performance on the Galbraith forum at:

http://www.robgalbraith.com/ubbthre....fpart=1 (http://www.robgalbraith.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB2&Number=119964&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1)

Peter Burian

Title: Pro 14n Evaluation by an Owner
Post by: scubastu on April 07, 2003, 03:45:55 pm

Yes, I shoot at ISO 80 all the time!  NOT.

(http://www.scan-conversions.com/sandhill3.jpg)

ISO 400, Canon EOS 10D. 100-400L with EF1.4II.

There is NO noise in the dark areas of the print (Canon S9000, 13x19 size)

I'm sorry, but why flog a such an inferior product?  It's like all those folks on who say their Sigma 15-30 zooms shoot as well as the 16-35L...once it's at f11.... Yes the 14n is cheaper, and unfortunately...it shows!

my 2 cents....

stu

Title: Pro 14n Evaluation by an Owner
Post by: Peter K. Burian on April 09, 2003, 07:23:43 am

Quote

I noticed all the guys in the forum you mentioned are studio photographers shooting at ISO 80, no mention of ISO 400 or 800 testing.

Yes, studio photographers.

I did not suggest they provided test reports, just comments about their experiences.

Peter Burian