Luminous Landscape Forum
Site & Board Matters => About This Site => Topic started by: SeanBK on August 05, 2009, 09:01:35 am
-
Michael R, As always a nice opening image. But I can't help to notice that recently you don't post the technical details/metadata, i.e Camera, lens... It would be nice to know the detailsincluding process as the images are as always quite good.
I do like this one, especially.
-
Michael R, As always a nice opening image. But I can't help to notice that recently you don't post the technical details/metadata, i.e Camera, lens... It would be nice to know the detailsincluding process as the images are as always quite good.
I do like this one, especially.
On another thread someone suggested that perhaps these were from the film days and thus had no EXIF data embedded to provide that info.
On the other hand, perhaps it is an intentional omission intended to encourage viewers to pay more attention to the image and less to the equipment. If so, I applaud him. "More seeing; less pixel peeping!"
Or, he could be following Edward Weston's lead, who, when asked for technical data said, "The camera was faithfully used."
Or, maybe he's now convinced by K*n R*ckw*ll that "Your camera doesn't matter."
Anyhow, I like the Cloud Swirl, too!
-
I add camera info when I'm testing or working with a new camera, but when it's previous work it doesn't seem terribly relevant, especially at web sizes.
In any event, if I remember correctly it was a Canon 1Ds MKII with the 70-200mm lens.
Michael
-
Dude....that was seriously funny!!!
LOL!!
Cheers....
Todd in Chicago
Or, maybe he's now convinced by K*n R*ckw*ll that "Your camera doesn't matter."
Anyhow, I like the Cloud Swirl, too!
-
I add camera info when I'm testing or working with a new camera, but when it's previous work it doesn't seem terribly relevant, especially at web sizes.
In any event, if I remember correctly it was a Canon 1Ds MKII with the 70-200mm lens.
Michael
Thank you. Apreciate the reply & agree with you.