Luminous Landscape Forum

Equipment & Techniques => Medium Format / Film / Digital Backs – and Large Sensor Photography => Topic started by: jsch on March 09, 2009, 04:00:47 pm

Title: Film vs. Digital
Post by: jsch on March 09, 2009, 04:00:47 pm

Hi,

I wanted to share this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YpO6PypJIQ...feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YpO6PypJIQ&feature=related)

Rankin re-did Cecil Beaton once with film and once with digital. It's not about sharpness, it's about the look.

This is part 2 of 8 parts. The other parts are also very interesting. Perhaps you know it already.

Best,
Johannes

Title: Film vs. Digital
Post by: Doug Peterson on March 09, 2009, 05:20:51 pm

Quote from: jsch

Hi,

I wanted to share this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YpO6PypJIQ...feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YpO6PypJIQ&feature=related)

Rankin re-did Cecil Beaton once with film and once with digital. It's not about sharpness, it's about the look.

This is part 2 of 8 parts. The other parts are also very interesting. Perhaps you know it already.

Best,
Johannes

C1 Pro version 3, Mamiya RZ Pro IID with a Mamiya/Phase mount Phase One Digital Back. Not a bad combo.

That said, if you're looking to replicate a period photo you should use period equipment.

I wonder if having a more enigmatic look while shooting film had anything to do with the fact that she had yet to sit in a hot-light cake for hour(s?).

__________________
Doug Peterson (Email Me) (http://"mailto:doug@captureintegration.com)
Head of Technical Services
Phase One, Canon, Apple, Profoto, Eizo & More
National: 877.217.9870  |  Cell: 740.707.2183
Newsletter: Read Latest or Sign Up (http://"http://www.captureintegration.com/our-company/newsletters/)

Title: Film vs. Digital
Post by: amsp on March 09, 2009, 06:13:55 pm

Thanks for posting, hadn't seen this documentary.