Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => Landscape Showcase => Topic started by: Rajan Parrikar on November 17, 2017, 01:23:33 am
-
Ljósárgil (http://blog.parrikar.com/2017/11/16/ljosargil/) - in East Iceland.
-
#1 is very engaging. Nice use of the long lens.
-
The first one is interesting with the V shaped draw and the waterfall. In the second shot, the waterfall is lost in the landscape.
-
To me, #1 is the best here.
-
The first one is interesting with the V shaped draw and the waterfall. In the second shot, the waterfall is lost in the landscape.
+1 for the same reasons.
Thierry
-
#1. Do you have any shots that are closer to the falls? It's great to see quality photos of areas of the world that are not easily accessible.
-
Another vote for #1!
-
+1
-
Thank you, all.
#1. Do you have any shots that are closer to the falls? It's great to see quality photos of areas of the world that are not easily accessible.
Yes, I do.
What I really wanted was a drone run over the canyon but extremely strong gusts thwarted those plans.
-
I also like #1. I like the angles that lead your eye to the falls. One day I will return to Iceland!
-
no. 1! even in the small preview it‘s a good abstract.
-
Thank you, all.
Yes, I do.
What I really wanted was a drone run over the canyon but extremely strong gusts thwarted those plans.
A drone shot would be awesome! But I know about the "gusts" there. I had a camera case ripped out of my hand by the wind when I was stationed there at Keflavik. I miss Iceland very much.
-
Beautiful! I'm also a fan of #1 although #2 does give some nice context.
-
Thank you again, gentlemen.
Beautiful! I'm also a fan of #1 although #2 does give some nice context.
Yes, context was the intent in #2. The first was meant to be the 'serious' image.
-
The first one I really like a lot, but the plain sky in the second one doesn't seem to add anything to the shot, in fact for me it takes away from it - although when I usually comment like this about unnecessary skies in abstract type images, I usually get told that I couldn't be more wrong and the sky is a necessary counterpoint to the rest of the image or something, but hey that's how I see the world through my viewfinder when I am composing images like this I suppose and we all need to be different don't we :)
Dave
-
The first one I really like a lot, but the plain sky in the second one doesn't seem to add anything to the shot, in fact for me it takes away from it - although when I usually comment like this about unnecessary skies in abstract type images, I usually get told that I couldn't be more wrong and the sky is a necessary counterpoint to the rest of the image or something, but hey that's how I see the world through my viewfinder when I am composing images like this I suppose and we all need to be different don't we :)
Dave
Thanks, Dave, for the critique. As I mentioned about, the second was more a ‘provide the context’ image.
-
The top is subtle and well comp'd.