Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => Discussing Photographic Styles => Topic started by: TropicalWilson on July 06, 2016, 08:34:29 am
-
Saw this article and these images struck me as looking very 'out the box' and not post processed. I wondered what peoples thoughts were on the reasons why, the merits, critique etc.
http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/07/05/obamas-official-photographer-took-2-million-photos-8-years-favorites/
-
Saw this article and these images struck me as looking very 'out the box' and not post processed. I wondered what peoples thoughts were on the reasons why, the merits, critique etc.
http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/07/05/obamas-official-photographer-took-2-million-photos-8-years-favorites/
he is not a weeding photographer, is he ? etc ...
-
I like his photos, somehow the photographer's presence is not felt, which to me is the hallmark of a good event photographer.
-
... looking very 'out the box' and not post processed...
Just curious, what makes you say so?
-
Saw this article and these images struck me as looking very 'out the box' and not post processed. I wondered what peoples thoughts were on the reasons why, the merits, critique etc.
http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/07/05/obamas-official-photographer-took-2-million-photos-8-years-favorites/
His job is to document. You do that best by getting out of the way as much as possible. Of course, it's impossible to escape the three decisions that always bias photographs: where the photographer stood, where he pointed the camera, and when he tripped the shutter.
Jim
-
His job is to document. You do that best by getting out of the way as much as possible. Of course, it's impossible to escape the three decisions that always bias photographs: where the photographer stood, where he pointed the camera, and when he tripped the shutter.
Jim
and @ the type of pictures posted he might as well simply do the video... less chance to miss the moment really, I hope WH has the budget for the storage ;D
-
I hope WH has the budget for the storage ;D
Compliments of the American Tax Payer...as always
Peter
-
Compliments of the American Tax Payer...as always
Peter
well, rather this than WMD adventure
-
Saw this article and these images struck me as looking very 'out the box' and not post processed. I wondered what peoples thoughts were on the reasons why, the merits, critique etc.
http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/07/05/obamas-official-photographer-took-2-million-photos-8-years-favorites/
I admit I find the question strange: is it necessary to justify not processing? He had plenty of real content, he didn't need to push local contrast to add zing to boring shots.
-
I call the look 'out the box' because of dark areas without much detail (eg the suits). Im sure the images were carefully produced, they are good, but I wonder about aesthetic of processing and peoples views. Also, probably the 'realness' of the content is influencing my perception of the processing too.
Should unprocessed images be justified? No, but I do sometimes question the authenticity attributed to unprocessed images, given the extent of variation possible in camera, including engineers trying to make things pop by default.
Thanks for your views!