Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: Jeremy Roussak on August 28, 2015, 03:18:38 pm

Title: cascade
Post by: Jeremy Roussak on August 28, 2015, 03:18:38 pm
I wasn't sure about this one. My wife, who is pretty dismissive of all but a few of my photos, saw it on the monitor and said, spontaneously, that she liked it.

Thoughts?

Jeremy
Title: Re: cascade
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on August 28, 2015, 03:38:19 pm
She's a keeper (the wife) :)
Title: Re: cascade
Post by: Bruce Cox on August 28, 2015, 04:03:19 pm
The railing or something else in the bottom right corner isn't much of a problem, but I think moving the center the smidgen to the left that trimming the right side until it is gone does good things for the composition and pushes the battle between light and darkness in the right or is it left direction.
Title: Re: cascade
Post by: brandtb on August 29, 2015, 09:42:03 am
Really fantastic subject.  Maybe bring up exp. in deep shadows or overall exp.I would also look at increasing saturation a bit in reddish/brown and green tones...and maybe bringing up luminance in same. Wonderful to see the glassy quality of the water represented. /B
Title: Re: cascade
Post by: Jeremy Roussak on August 29, 2015, 11:30:00 am
Thanks, all.

The first one below is the original, reworked a little as suggested. The second and third are the same scene but with shorter and longer exposures. I thought the one I originally posted was probably the optimum: what do you think?

Jeremy
Title: Re: cascade
Post by: Bob_B on August 29, 2015, 08:09:47 pm
I think BobDavid would have a field day with those three images.,. Lol.
Title: Re: cascade
Post by: Jeremy Roussak on August 30, 2015, 04:16:52 am
I think BobDavid would have a field day with those three images.,. Lol.

In some ways, of course, each one looks as if he already has!

Jeremy
Title: Re: cascade
Post by: RSL on August 30, 2015, 02:42:51 pm
Your wife was right, Jeremy. The first one was fine. You framed it on the camera. Your framing was good. Whey does everybody think you have to dork around with a picture to "improve' it before it's worthwhile?
Title: Re: cascade
Post by: Bruce Cox on August 31, 2015, 10:24:03 am
I like II-4.
Title: Re: cascade
Post by: brandtb on August 31, 2015, 03:49:36 pm
Quote
I like II-4
+1