Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: luxborealis on April 12, 2015, 05:48:12 pm

Title: Early Spring in a Beech Forest
Post by: luxborealis on April 12, 2015, 05:48:12 pm
Here are two from earlier today - a beautiful early spring morning with the ground just starting to thaw. It's a a small conservation area south of the city on the moraine I go back to three or four times a year and am never disappointed.

Both were made with a D800E and AF-S 18-35mm on a tripod at ISO 100; processed in LR 5.7 w/ slight toning

Spring Woods: 35mm; ƒ11; -⅔EV

Winter into Spring: 24mm; ƒ8; -⅔EV - I tried this one at ƒ11 and ƒ16, but in both cases the background was too obvious
Title: Re: Early Spring in a Beech Forest
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on April 12, 2015, 11:53:34 pm
I like both, but especially the first. The way the fallen logs slant one way and the shadows slant the other, while the young trees stand upright adds a lovely geometry to the image.
Title: Re: Early Spring in a Beech Forest
Post by: mezzoduomo on April 13, 2015, 09:09:54 am
I too like both, and prefer the second. But 'f8' and your comment about the background make me wonder why not f4? You had a tripod, so......
????
Title: Re: Early Spring in a Beech Forest
Post by: BobDavid on April 13, 2015, 09:22:04 am
The first one looks great at full-screen size. Tasty black and white.
Title: Re: Early Spring in a Beech Forest
Post by: churly on April 13, 2015, 12:34:54 pm
Both nice Terry but the first is special.
Chuck
Title: Re: Early Spring in a Beech Forest
Post by: luxborealis on April 15, 2015, 09:07:13 pm
Is it all young regrowth?

No, there are some larger beeches as well. It's an area of second growth forest with a few areas, such as this, that are more recent after a tornado touched down some years ago.
Title: Re: Early Spring in a Beech Forest
Post by: luxborealis on April 15, 2015, 09:09:53 pm
I too like both, and prefer the second. But 'f8' and your comment about the background make me wonder why not f4? You had a tripod, so......
????

At f4, the DOF was too shallow. I could have worked harder to get more parallel to the leaves, but still, there was sufficient depth to require a smaller aperture.