Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => The Coffee Corner => Topic started by: HSakols on April 02, 2015, 08:48:22 am

Title: California's Snow Pack
Post by: HSakols on April 02, 2015, 08:48:22 am
California is finally mandating water use reductions.  Check out the difference in snow pack in the Sierra Nevada from 2011 until now. http://patch.com/california/sanmateo/gov-brown-orders-statewide-mandatory-water-use-reductions 
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: Alan Goldhammer on April 02, 2015, 08:53:55 am
It's really bad out there.  I really wonder why they did not re-purpose the San Onofre nuclear plant as a large scale water desalinization facility.  When I was growing up in San Diego there was a small nuclear desalinization plant not far from my home but they moved it to Guantanomo Cuba when Castro blockaded the base back in the 1960s.  Advances in desalinzation and reuse of waste water including treated sewage water look to be the only answers if the drought coupled with global warming increase scarcity.
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on April 02, 2015, 11:59:05 am
Since early February I've been wishing there were a way we could send our excess Massachusetts snow to California.
Now that April is here, I have a few spots of bare ground in my yard, but there are still piles three feet high in other spots.

Yes, I think desalinization is the only solution for them now, but it is pretty late to be starting it.

And I can't see why Nestle is still allowed to take millions of gallons of California water to bottle and sell at high prices elsewhere.
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: Telecaster on April 02, 2015, 05:04:10 pm
Yep, desalination in CA (and elsewhere too) seems inevitable. IMO in the short term Big Ag also needs to be more responsible. In the long term we need to get our heads around the fact that water doesn't disappear when we use it. It just gets modified. If you need more fresh water you can take non-fresh water, which we have in massive & renewable abundance, and make it fresh again. Tech + $$ + will.

-Dave-
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: Isaac on April 02, 2015, 07:28:31 pm
…water doesn't disappear when we use it.

"The facility purifies sewer water and injects it into its drinking water aquifer. (http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/2014/world/orange-county-recycled-water-system-shows-importance-collaboration/)"
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: amolitor on April 03, 2015, 09:28:10 am
Agriculture in CA is, in general, pretty conservative in their water usage. Their irrigation methods could probably be improved a bit, but we're down in the land of quite small improvements at this point.

Reality is that CA is probably over-populated and over-farmed. This is not the only part of the world with this problem. Desalinization on the scale required might be pretty impractical and would almost certainly have unintended consequences.
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: NancyP on April 03, 2015, 12:17:36 pm
The few times that I have been in California, I have noticed a lot of lawns. Those should go away first. Plant prickly pears.
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: Isaac on April 03, 2015, 12:49:47 pm
"Read more about the particulars of the governor’s order on his website here (http://gov.ca.gov/news.php?id=18910)."

-Replace 50 million square feet of lawns throughout the state with drought tolerant landscaping in partnership with local governments;

etc
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: Telecaster on April 04, 2015, 03:48:55 pm
"How to get Californians to use less water without forcing them to," from the Washington Post:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/04/04/how-to-get-californians-to-use-less-water-without-forcing-them-to/

-Dave-
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: Isaac on April 04, 2015, 05:58:48 pm
However, the big user is agriculture -- "In the rest of California where water is shared by all three sectors, environmental use is not dominant (33%, compared to 53% agricultural (http://www.ppic.org/main/publication_show.asp?i=1108) and 14% urban)."
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: BJL on April 04, 2015, 07:12:27 pm
The few times that I have been in California, I have noticed a lot of lawns. Those should go away first. Plant prickly pears.
Banning golf would be a good start!  But I think it's the strange arrangement of producing so much of the nations' food in one rather dry corner that is the bigger problem.
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: Isaac on April 04, 2015, 07:28:46 pm
The other strange arrangement is having 85% of US winter produce come from a dry corner of Mexico.
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: sesshin on April 05, 2015, 01:45:05 am
There needs to be a drastic reduction of both almond farms and cow farms, the question is how to get there. Almonds and California beef will have to become much more expensive, thats a given, but there just needs to be a whole lot less of that product put to market overall.
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: Isaac on April 05, 2015, 12:14:12 pm
California harvests 80% of the world's Almond (http://www.agmrc.org/commodities__products/nuts/almonds/) crop.
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: RSL on April 05, 2015, 12:23:58 pm
The few times that I have been in California, I have noticed a lot of lawns. Those should go away first. Plant prickly pears.

Right, Nancy. They need to get rid of lawns, golf courses, and swimming pools, and stop letting enviromentalists who have lawns and swimming pools and play golf, insist on letting a bunch of other people's water run out to sea to comfort a couple fish. If California had water laws like Colorado's this wouldn't be such a big problem.
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: mezzoduomo on April 05, 2015, 12:50:54 pm
Beer is the problem:

“It takes roughly 20 gallons of water to make a pint of beer, as much as 132
gallons of water to make a 2-liter bottle of soda, 39000 gallons of water to
produce the average domestic car, including the tires and about 5000 gallons of
water to grow a day’s good for a family of four.”

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Sorry to be so blatantly facetious about this critically important photographic(?) non-photographic, eminently permissible topic.
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: Telecaster on April 05, 2015, 05:11:17 pm
Beer is the problem

And pot. All that herbally goodness grown in the northern part of the state sucks down its share of water too.

Note: this is the Coffee Corner, where every topic is on topic.  ;)

-Dave-
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: francois on April 07, 2015, 05:49:59 am
The few times that I have been in California, I have noticed a lot of lawns. Those should go away first. Plant prickly pears.

In Socal, my neighbors used to spray special green paint on their dried-up lawn to save water (they said) during the hottest season…but on the other hand, every Saturday morning they washed their two or three cars, even in summer.

 ;)
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: Isaac on April 07, 2015, 12:40:16 pm
…every Saturday morning they washed their two or three cars, even in summer.

There are different ways to wash vehicles, some use a lot of water and some don't -- "Permanent mandatory restrictions have been in place since 2011, and apply year-around, whether the City is in a drought or not. These restrictions are designed to promote water conservation (http://www.sandiego.gov/water/conservation/drought/prohibitions.shtml) as a permanent way of life in San Diego."

Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: NancyP on April 08, 2015, 06:06:11 pm
I like prickly pears, in moderation. The flowers are lovely. One added advantage could be having your own garden - some people de-thorn the "leaves" and slice them up for salad - somewhat like cucumber salad. I have never tried the fruit of the prickly pear.

My St. Louis nature photographer friends are involved in a variety of volunteer conservation efforts. A few of them have converted most of their yards to native plantings, which help bring in insects, butterflies, birds (ie, subjects!). I like lawn alright, but don't need a huge amount of it, just a bit of grass to sit on and feed the chiggers  :P   (chiggers are the juvenile form of those bright red mites, less than 1 mm long, which looooooove nicely fertilized lawns)
Title: Re: California's Snow Pack
Post by: HSakols on April 10, 2015, 01:32:30 pm
I just returned from exploring the back country for the last six days.  We knew weather was coming and planned accordingly.  Maybe I should of gone to Florida for my week off instead.  This makes the situation a bit better.  These attachments show the snow accumulation that Yosemite got at about 8000 ft. As far as native plants go, I like the native lupines that are in my backyard.  Yes, we are watering our non natives with dish and shower water.