Luminous Landscape Forum
Equipment & Techniques => Landscape & Nature Photography => Topic started by: churly on January 06, 2014, 05:53:34 pm
-
Last time I used the term 'abstract' in a title I was thoroughly lashed by a commentator so I have been less specific this time :).
Chuck
Mini-Alps
(http://churly.zenfolio.com/img/s9/v96/p579238961-4.jpg)
Swamp Creature
(http://churly.zenfolio.com/img/s3/v25/p1033319317-5.jpg)
-
Oh, it seems very much representational... of a nightmare! ;)
EDIT: Upon re-reading my post above, it occurred to me it could be easily interpreted as if I am making fun of your photographs or implying something negative about them. Sorry if it came across that way, that wasn't my intention. I still stand by my "nightmare" impression, except I do not think it is a bad thing in itself to have in an abstract (or "less-representational") image.
-
Enjoy the first very much - lots to explore!
The second, less so, although the title is appropriate.
-
Enjoy the first very much - lots to explore!
The second, less so, although the title is appropriate.
I agree (I don't like writing "+1").
Jeremy
-
#1 for me, lovely textures and tones. the second one, it is a bit of a stretch...
-
Me too for the first one. A nice balance of tones and the lines help break up the stonework.
-
The first has a simple subject and repetition lacking from the second. Very nice.
-
Interesting comments. Thanks all.
Personally I like the simplicity of the first but I am more intrigued by the second shot and the mystery or potential menace of the two large dark eyes in the background. I guess that doesn't transmit.
I only had 3 of the 4 available monkeys (theoretical peak of 22 monkaflops) pushing buttons on the 2nd shot. The 4th was answering my emails. :)
Chuck
-
I agree (I don't like writing "+1").
Jeremy
+1.
(Sorry, Jeremy. Couldn't resist.)
The first is easier to grasp, thus easier to like, but the second is also good (but more work for the lazy viewer).