Think it would help flatten things, but does it shift the nodal point?
thanks
Think it would help flatten things, but does it shift the nodal point?
thanks
Thought the right way is to keep the nodal point stationary, with what I've shot using both my legacy shift lenses and newer auto shift lenses, the stitching goes together easily. My feeling is for landscapes, the nodal point is less critical than in would be for a macro subject where moving the lens will drastically change the perspective/p.o.v. of the image.
Agreed. By shifting and moving the body in the opposite direction, this keeps the lens and hence the nodal point stationery does it not?
For first shot, shift lens N mm to the left, and slide the camera N mm to the right; now the lens is back where it started.
For next shot, centre the shift, and centre the camera/lens; lens is still in same position wrt the world.
For third shot, shift lens N mm to the right, and slide the camara N mm to the left; lens is still in same position wrt the world.
sounds like a great deal of work or approximation
I'd be interested to hear peoples experiences with keeping the tripod and camera completely level in all directions, then shifting down to eliminate unwanted sky and proceeding to do a normal 7 or 8 shot panorama by panning both the camera and lens left to right, while centred around the lens' nodal point.
Specifically I'd like to know if the use of shift in this way helps to keep straight lines straight? Could you use Photoshop’s "reposition" (which doesn't lose quality) stitching mode rather than "cylindrical"?