Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: stamper on September 20, 2013, 08:51:20 am

Title: Two for one
Post by: stamper on September 20, 2013, 08:51:20 am
Twins?
Title: Re: Two for one
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on September 20, 2013, 10:17:35 am
Possibly. At least they use the same optician.
Title: Re: Two for one
Post by: Jeremy Roussak on September 20, 2013, 01:54:40 pm
Quote from: stamper on September 20, 2013, 08:51:20 am
Twins?

Not monozygotic: one of them's blurred.

Jeremy
Title: Re: Two for one
Post by: Rob C on September 20, 2013, 02:25:26 pm
Quote from: kikashi on September 20, 2013, 01:54:40 pm
Not monozygotic: one of them's blurred.

Jeremy


Obviously, I had to look that one up! Maybe two fathers at the same time - more or less?

Being shaken and strirred, contrary to Mr Bond's advice, might have caused the perma-blur to happen to the one poor lass at conception. I find medicine fascinating. If alarming. If there's a moral, perhaps it's to avoid the use of mixers in your drinks.

Rob C
Title: Re: Two for one
Post by: David Eckels on September 20, 2013, 03:40:42 pm
Quote from: Rob C on September 20, 2013, 02:25:26 pm
Obviously, I had to look that one up! Maybe two fathers at the same time - more or less?
Had this twice in my own lab career and one instance from another lab of three different fathers for triplets! No lie!
Title: Re: Two for one
Post by: Rob C on September 20, 2013, 06:03:32 pm
Quote from: David Eckels on September 20, 2013, 03:40:42 pm
Had this twice in my own lab career and one instance from another lab of three different fathers for triplets! No lie!


Busy 'lady'!

Rob C
Title: Re: Two for one
Post by: Harald L on September 20, 2013, 06:04:09 pm
Quote from: stamper on September 20, 2013, 08:51:20 am
Twins?

Doesn't matter. A great shot anyway. Had attention immediately.

Harald