Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: Sanggay on March 08, 2013, 02:57:33 am

Title: A cat.
Post by: Sanggay on March 08, 2013, 02:57:33 am
The cat was sleeping on my car. I saw the morning light striking its face.
Here are 2 different shots. I zoomed in on the B&W.

Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: Rob C on March 08, 2013, 06:41:12 am
The cat was sleeping on my car. I saw the morning light striking its face.
Here are 2 different shots. I zoomed in on the B&W.





You are risking your life or, more importantly, your credibility!

;-)

Rob C
Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: David Eckels on March 08, 2013, 07:41:55 am
Top one, definitely. BW version is cropped too tightly IMO.
Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: RSL on March 08, 2013, 08:34:45 am
Wow. Rob's right: You're in dangerous territory. ROTFL.
Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: Dale Villeponteaux on March 08, 2013, 10:47:55 am
By way of explanation, somewhere there is a dictum posted by Mr. Reichmann which essentially states:  No cats!
Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: francois on March 08, 2013, 11:01:08 am
Top one, definitely. BW version is cropped too tightly IMO.

My choice also and for the same reason!
Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: Brett_D on March 08, 2013, 12:04:09 pm
My choice also and for the same reason!
I agree with the dictum.
Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on March 08, 2013, 12:15:52 pm
By way of explanation, somewhere there is a dictum posted by Mr. Reichmann which essentially states:  No cats!

Even worse! The rumor has it that S&P and Moody are going to downgrade this site due to the proliferation of cat pictures.
Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: Johnny_Johnson on March 08, 2013, 04:19:16 pm
And if we could also do something about all those God awful, over saturated sun set/sun rise images we'd really be on to something.

Later,
Johnny
Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on March 08, 2013, 05:05:48 pm
And if we could also do something about all those God awful, over saturated sun set/sun rise images we'd really be on to something.

He, he... serves me right ;)
Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: Johnny_Johnson on March 08, 2013, 07:47:07 pm
He, he... serves me right ;)

But Slobodan, yours was only one of the innumerable sunsets that are posted each week.    ;D

Cya,
Johnny
Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on March 08, 2013, 09:20:23 pm
Here's a simple solution: Change the name of the thread to " Dog."
That should get it past the censors.
Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: Dave (Isle of Skye) on March 09, 2013, 05:22:52 am

You are risking your life or, more importantly, your credibility!

;-)

Rob C

Te he..   ;D ;D ;D

Dave
Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: Rob C on March 09, 2013, 08:11:45 am
And if we could also do something about all those God awful, over saturated sun set/sun rise images we'd really be on to something.

Later,
Johnny



You can: avoid specif¡ic sections, as do I.

Downside? I have to take other people's opinions that there really are lots of those early/late sun images about. I can live with that.

Rob C
Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: Richowens on March 09, 2013, 09:43:26 am
By way of explanation, somewhere there is a dictum posted by Mr. Reichmann which essentially states:  No cats!

 No No No........Michael has stated that every photographer is entitled to ONE cat picture per year. Only one.

 This was in response to someone chiding him over a shot of a cat and urn from Argentina.

Rich

2636   Site & Board Matters / About This Site / Now I've seen it all  on: January 03, 2006, 08:13:36 AM 
Every photographer is allowed one cat picture a year.

I simply figured that I'd get mine out of the way early.

Michael
Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: cjogo on March 09, 2013, 06:37:33 pm
Theres that one cat a year shot ;) -- Northern Latvia   1989 ... Hassy /\  80mm
Title: Re: A cat.
Post by: dhancock on March 12, 2013, 08:20:57 pm
I don't think the reflection adds much to the photograph. I might have shifted the composition up.