Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: armand on February 24, 2013, 09:00:37 pm

Title: urban
Post by: armand on February 24, 2013, 09:00:37 pm

urban landscapes

Title: Re: urban
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on February 24, 2013, 10:53:35 pm

I like "sad."

Title: Re: urban
Post by: wolfnowl on February 25, 2013, 06:47:53 pm

Indeed.  Well seen.

Mike.

Title: Re: urban
Post by: francois on February 26, 2013, 03:51:23 am

Sad is interesting, simple yet evocative.

Title: Re: urban
Post by: NickMarkou on March 01, 2013, 11:42:51 am

Sad is alright, but for me the elements of the 1st image are really really interesting in a symbolic day, maybe in a different composition.the word "touch fee" on the sign, the red lit hand and the word green on the right hand .....there are nice ingredients

Title: Re: urban
Post by: l_d_allan on March 03, 2013, 01:35:19 pm

Quote from: wolfnowl on February 25, 2013, 06:47:53 pm

Indeed.  Well seen.

Agree. "Sad" has a simplicity and "humanity" somewhat like the Pixar lamp from the 90's.

It "might" have looked a bit more like a human face with "keystone distortion correction" done to extreme ... past the lines being vertical ... so that the lines were slanted "inwards" from top to bottom. It would look more like a "V" than a "^".  

Or "\  /" than "/  \"?

But without trying it, I can only speculate that such keystone correction could make the bricks and "eyes" look odd and distorted.