Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: Chris Calohan on February 18, 2013, 12:46:48 am
-
(http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8230/8485032874_2139404691_o.jpg)
-
Yup. That it is! Except for the local wildlife, anyway. Did you consider doing any keystone correction, or are you content with it as is?
Mike.
-
I did some but honestly think the building is leaning forward in its journey toward total oblivion. Will check however. Thanks for the observation..
As to local wildlife, I never saw the first thing fly, crawl, run, slither or (no water of course), swim by and I was there for over an hour. This was as quiet and desolate a place as I've ever been.
-
Slight processing variation. Redo did reveal a slight tilt abberation as a smidgeon of perspective off.
(http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8528/8485932590_8e219db8cc_o.jpg)
-
Slight processing variation. Redo did reveal a slight tilt abberation as a smidgeon of perspective off.
You couldn't give it just a tad more space on the right, could you? It looks cramped.
Jeremy
-
You couldn't give it just a tad more space on the right, could you? It looks cramped.
Jeremy
I agree and I would try either to reshoot or use content-aware tool in PP.
-
I will probably do a reshoot and go for a more horizontal composition.
-
I will probably do a reshoot and go for a more horizontal composition.
That's certainly worth a try, but it wasn't my point. The dark sky complements the abandoned building. I like the vertical composition: I'd just prefer it (as the punchline in the original shaggy dog story almost goes) not so damn vertical.
Jeremy
-
That was my "not as successful as I thought it would be" attempt to give the building back some of its former majesty, lording over the community it supported for so long.
I do understand what you're getting at and I will incoporprate that vertical/horizontal thinking into the next compositions.